GS Notes

6. Economics Notes 06

15 min read

Based on the provided summary, here are the detailed academic notes.

Elaborate Notes

  • Tax Base: This refers to the total amount of assets, income, or economic activity that is subject to taxation by a tax authority. It is the value upon which a tax rate is applied. For instance, in the context of Income Tax, the tax base is the net income of an individual or entity after all permissible deductions and exemptions. For Goods and Services Tax (GST), the tax base is the value of the supply of goods or services. The broadening of the tax base is a key objective of tax reforms, as seen in the recommendations of the Raja Chelliah Committee (1991-93), which argued that a wider base with moderate rates leads to better compliance and higher revenue.
  • Excise Duty: This is a form of indirect tax levied on goods produced or manufactured within a country. Constitutionally, the power to levy excise duty on most goods (except alcoholic liquor, opium, etc.) rests with the Union Government under Entry 84 of the Union List (List I) of the Seventh Schedule. Historically, the Central Excise Act, 1944 was the primary legislation governing this tax. Post-GST implementation in 2017, Central Excise Duty has been subsumed for most goods, but it is still levied on items like petroleum products and tobacco.
  • Sales Tax: This is an indirect tax imposed on the sale of goods. Under the Constitution, the power to levy taxes on the sale or purchase of goods within a state belongs to the State Governments, as per Entry 54 of the State List (List II). This led to a fragmented market with varying state-level Value Added Tax (VAT) systems before 2017. Inter-state sales were subject to Central Sales Tax (CST), levied by the Centre but collected and retained by the originating state. Both Sales Tax and CST were subsumed under GST.
  • Progressive Taxation: This is a system where the tax rate increases as the taxable amount (income or profit) increases. This principle is rooted in the concept of ‘ability to pay’, a key tenet of equitable taxation articulated by economists like Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations (1776) as the “canon of equity”. India’s personal income tax system is a prime example, with different income slabs attracting progressively higher tax rates. The primary goal is to reduce income inequality by placing a greater tax burden on those who can afford it most.
  • Tax Exemption vs. Tax Rebate:
    • Tax Exemption: This refers to a specific amount of income that is not subject to tax at all. It effectively reduces the taxable income base. For example, if there is an exemption limit of ₹3 lakh, this amount is deducted from the total income of every taxpayer, regardless of their income slab, before calculating the tax liability.
    • Tax Rebate: This is a deduction from the amount of tax payable. It is generally targeted and conditional. For instance, under Section 87A of the Income Tax Act, a rebate is offered to individuals with income up to a certain threshold (e.g., ₹7 lakh in the new regime). If a person’s income slightly exceeds this threshold (e.g., ₹7.1 lakh), they do not receive the rebate and must pay tax on their entire taxable income (after the basic exemption). A rebate directly reduces the final tax bill, whereas an exemption reduces the income on which the tax is calculated.
  • Customs Duty: This tax is levied on goods when they are transported across international borders (imports and exports). Import duties are more common than export duties. Historically, India pursued an Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) strategy in the 1960s and 1970s, characterized by extremely high customs duties (tariffs) to protect nascent domestic industries from foreign competition. Following the LPG Reforms of 1991, tariff rates were rationalized and significantly reduced to integrate India with the global economy. As noted, governments also use customs duty as a tool to manage domestic prices; for example, reducing import duties on raw materials like steel can help curb cost-push inflation.
  • Indirect Taxes vs. Direct Taxes:
    • Indirect Taxes: The key characteristic of an indirect tax is that its burden can be shifted. The impact (the initial point where the tax is levied, e.g., the manufacturer) and the incidence (the ultimate entity who bears the burden, e.g., the consumer) are on different persons. Examples include GST and Customs Duty. These taxes are often considered regressive because they are levied at a flat rate on goods and services, thus consuming a larger proportion of income for the poor than for the rich.
    • Direct Taxes: In this case, the burden cannot be shifted. The impact and incidence fall on the same person or entity. It is levied directly on the income or wealth of an individual or corporation. Examples include Personal Income Tax and Corporate Tax. These are generally progressive and are considered more equitable.
  • Methodology of Taxing:
    • Progressive Tax: As explained, the tax rate rises with the tax base. (e.g., Indian Income Tax).
    • Regressive Tax: The tax rate effectively decreases as the amount subject to taxation increases. Indirect taxes are classic examples. A ₹10 tax on a salt packet constitutes a much larger percentage of a poor person’s daily income compared to a rich person’s.
    • Proportional Tax (Flat Tax): A fixed tax rate is applied to all taxpayers, regardless of their income or profit level. For example, India’s Corporate Tax is largely proportional, where a standard rate (e.g., 22% or 25%) is applied to the profits of companies.
  • Cascading Effect: Also known as “tax on tax,” this occurs in an inefficient tax system where a product is taxed at every stage of production, and the tax paid at an earlier stage becomes part of the cost base for taxation at the next stage. The pre-GST system in India, involving Central Excise and State VAT, suffered from this problem as credit for taxes paid on services could not be set off against taxes on goods, and vice-versa. This led to an inflated final price for the consumer. The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), a comprehensive value-added tax, was primarily aimed at eliminating this cascading effect by allowing seamless input tax credit across the supply chain.
  • Laffer Curve: This concept, popularized by economist Arthur Laffer in the 1970s, illustrates a theoretical relationship between tax rates and tax revenue. It posits that as tax rates rise from 0%, tax revenue also rises. However, after a certain optimal point, further increases in the tax rate lead to a fall in tax revenue. This is because excessively high rates disincentivize work, saving, and investment, and encourage tax evasion and tax avoidance. The theory was influential in the “supply-side economics” policies of the Reagan administration in the US.
  • Tax Evasion vs. Tax Avoidance:
    • Tax Evasion: This is the illegal non-payment or under-payment of tax. It involves deliberately misrepresenting or concealing income and financial affairs from tax authorities. It is a criminal offense punishable by penalties and imprisonment.
    • Tax Avoidance: This is the legal practice of using loopholes and ambiguities in the tax code to reduce one’s tax liability. While legal, it often violates the spirit of the law. A prominent form is Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS), where multinational companies (MNCs) like Google or Amazon shift profits from high-tax jurisdictions (like India) to low-tax jurisdictions or tax havens by making internal payments for royalties or services. The Vodafone-Hutchison case (2007) is a landmark example in India concerning the taxation of offshore transactions. To counter such practices, India has introduced measures like the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR).
  • Tax Havens and Shell Companies:
    • Tax Havens: These are countries or jurisdictions with very low or no taxes, high levels of financial secrecy, and a lack of transparency. Examples include the Cayman Islands, Mauritius, and Cyprus. They attract foreign investment and deposits by providing a discreet environment for individuals and corporations to park their funds, often for tax avoidance or money laundering.
    • Shell Company: This is a company that exists only on paper, with no real office or employees. It is often registered in a tax haven and is used as a vehicle for financial manoeuvres, such as routing money, avoiding taxes, or obscuring ownership, without having any significant legitimate business operations.

Taxation and Economic Policy in India

  • Pre-1991 Era: The 1960s and 1970s were marked by a socialist-oriented economic policy with extremely high marginal tax rates (income tax rates exceeded 90% at their peak). This, combined with a complex tax structure and inefficient administration, led to widespread tax evasion, low tax-to-GDP ratio, and the growth of a parallel “black” economy. The high government spending on subsidies and public sector enterprises, coupled with poor revenue collection, resulted in a large and persistent fiscal deficit, which culminated in the balance of payments crisis of 1991.
  • Post-1991 Reforms: Following the 1991 crisis, India initiated first-generation reforms focusing on liberalisation, privatisation, and globalisation (LPG). Tax reforms, guided by the Raja Chelliah Committee, were a crucial component. The focus shifted to simplifying the tax structure, lowering rates, broadening the base, and improving administration. Second-generation reforms (post-2000) continued this process and began to focus on deeper structural issues, including in the agriculture sector. A key realisation was that for development to be sustainable, it must be inclusive, requiring government investment in social welfare, which in turn requires robust revenue collection.
  • Monetary Policy and the RBI-Government Dynamic:
    • Monetary Policy: Managed by the central bank (RBI in India), it deals with the supply of money and credit in the economy to achieve macroeconomic objectives.
    • The Tussle: The government, being a political entity, often prioritizes short-term GDP growth, especially around election cycles. It therefore pressures the RBI to adopt an expansionary monetary policy (or “dovish” stance) by cutting interest rates. Lower rates make loans cheaper, encouraging consumption and investment, which boosts GDP. However, this increased demand can lead to demand-pull inflation.
    • RBI’s Mandate: The RBI, as the guardian of macroeconomic stability, is primarily concerned with controlling inflation, as high inflation disproportionately hurts the poor and erodes savings. It might therefore prefer a contractionary monetary policy (or “hawkish” stance) by raising interest rates to curb inflation, even if it temporarily dampens growth.
    • The Dual Dilemma: This refers to the challenge faced by the RBI in simultaneously trying to control inflation and promote growth, as the policy actions for one often have an adverse effect on the other. This dilemma became particularly acute after 2011 when India faced a period of high inflation with slowing growth (stagflationary pressures).
    • Shift in Framework: To resolve this dilemma and provide a clear mandate, the Urjit Patel Committee (2014) recommended that the RBI should adopt Flexible Inflation Targeting (FIT) as its primary objective. This led to a 2016 amendment of the RBI Act, 1934, establishing the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) with a legal mandate to maintain inflation within a target range (currently 4% +/- 2%).

India’s Development Model and Associated Crises

  • India’s Socialism and Land Reforms:
    • Mixed Economy: Post-independence, India, under Jawaharlal Nehru, adopted a mixed economy model, attempting to blend capitalist and socialist principles. The state took control of the “commanding heights” of the economy, focusing on capital-intensive heavy industries as per the Mahalanobis model which guided the Second Five-Year Plan (1956-61).
    • Labour Laws: To protect workers, stringent labour laws were enacted. However, their complexity often made compliance difficult for businesses, leading to the rise of a vast informal sector and the use of contract labour, which lacked social security and job safety.
    • Land Reforms: A key element of post-independence social justice policy was land reform. The British had left behind exploitative land tenure systems like Zamindari, Ryotwari, and Mahalwari. By independence, intermediaries like Zamindars controlled a vast portion of the land. The reforms aimed at:
      1. Abolition of Intermediaries: Zamindari Abolition Acts were passed by states to eliminate the rent-seeking class between the state and the tiller.
      2. Tenancy Reforms: To provide security of tenure to tenant farmers and regulate rents.
      3. Land Ceilings: Imposing a limit on the amount of land an individual or family could own, with the surplus land to be redistributed among the landless. These reforms had limited success due to legal loopholes, poor implementation, and lack of political will, as documented by scholars like P.C. Joshi.
  • Regulated Agricultural Markets (Mandis): To protect farmers from exploitation by moneylenders and traders, and to prevent distress selling, the government promoted the establishment of regulated markets through the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) Acts. Farmers were often required to sell their produce through these government-designated Mandis. However, over time, these Mandis themselves became problematic, with traders forming cartels, opaque price discovery, and entry barriers due to difficult licensing processes.
  • The Moral vs. Economic Crisis: This perspective suggests that many of India’s economic problems are not merely technical or policy-related but are rooted in a deeper ethical or moral crisis. The failure of land reforms, the capture of Mandis by cartels, the corruption in the “License Raj” (e.g., 2G scam), and the evolution of “crony socialism” into “crony capitalism” are all examples where systems designed for public good were subverted for private gain due to a lack of integrity and governance. This reflects a crisis of institutions and values, not just of economic models.

Prelims Pointers

  • Tax Base: The total value of income, assets, or activity on which tax is imposed.
  • Excise Duty: A tax on manufacturing/production; levied by the Centre (Union List, Entry 84).
  • Sales Tax: A tax on the sale of goods within a state; levied by the States (State List, Entry 54).
  • Progressive Tax: Tax rate increases as income increases. Example: Personal Income Tax.
  • Regressive Tax: Takes a larger percentage of income from low-income earners. Example: Indirect Taxes like GST.
  • Proportional Tax: A fixed tax rate for all income levels. Example: Corporate Tax.
  • Tax Exemption: Reduces the taxable income base for all taxpayers.
  • Tax Rebate: A deduction from the final tax payable, usually targeted at specific income groups.
  • Customs Duty: A tax on imported and exported goods.
  • Impact of Tax: The initial point of levy or first point of contact.
  • Incidence of Tax: The entity that ultimately bears the burden of the tax.
  • In Direct Tax, impact and incidence are on the same person.
  • In Indirect Tax, impact and incidence are on different persons.
  • Cascading Effect: Term for ‘tax on tax’, which was a major flaw of the pre-GST regime.
  • Laffer Curve: Represents the relationship between tax rates and tax revenue.
  • Tax Evasion: Illegal non-payment of tax.
  • Tax Avoidance: Legal method of reducing tax liability using loopholes.
  • Tax Haven: A jurisdiction with low/no taxes and high financial secrecy.
  • Shell Company: A company existing only on paper, often used for tax avoidance or money laundering.
  • Urjit Patel Committee: Recommended the adoption of Flexible Inflation Targeting for the RBI.
  • Monetary Policy Committee (MPC): Set up in 2016 to decide the policy repo rate and manage inflation.
  • Expansionary Monetary Policy: Involves reducing interest rates to increase money supply and boost growth.
  • Contractionary Monetary Policy: Involves increasing interest rates to reduce money supply and control inflation.
  • APMC: Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee; bodies that run regulated agricultural markets (Mandis).

Mains Insights

The Dilemma of India’s Tax Structure

  • Equity vs. Efficiency: India faces a classic public finance dilemma. Direct taxes (like income tax) are progressive and equitable but have a narrow base due to a large informal economy and low per-capita income. This forces reliance on indirect taxes (like GST), which are easier to collect (efficient) but are regressive, disproportionately burdening the poor. This structural issue complicates efforts to achieve both fiscal consolidation and social justice.
  • Tax Avoidance and Global Governance: The issue of tax avoidance by MNCs through Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) highlights the challenges to national tax sovereignty in a globalized world. India’s response, including the adoption of GAAR and the Equalisation Levy (“Google Tax”), reflects a broader global push led by the OECD for greater tax transparency and fairness. This is a critical aspect of GS Paper II (International Relations) and GS Paper III (Economy).

Monetary Policy: Independence and Accountability

  • The Growth vs. Inflation Trade-off: The tussle between the Government and the RBI is an institutional manifestation of the short-term political preference for growth versus the long-term economic necessity of price stability. The establishment of the MPC with a clear inflation target was a move to depoliticize monetary policy and enhance the RBI’s credibility.
  • Critique of Inflation Targeting: While inflation targeting provides a clear anchor, critics argue it can be too rigid for a developing economy like India, which is prone to supply-side shocks (e.g., erratic monsoons, global oil price volatility). An exclusive focus on inflation might lead the RBI to tighten policy and sacrifice growth even when the inflation is not demand-driven. This debate is central to understanding the evolution of India’s macroeconomic framework.

The Moral Underpinnings of Economic Failures

  • Economic Crisis as a Moral Crisis: The summary points to a powerful analytical lens for GS Paper IV (Ethics) and the Essay paper. The failures of well-intentioned policies like land reforms, the License Raj, or APMC Mandis were not just economic miscalculations. They represent a moral failure where public office was used for private enrichment, institutions were captured by vested interests, and the rule of law was subverted.
  • Cause and Effect Analysis:
    1. Cause: A weak ethical framework in governance and a lack of accountability.
    2. Effect: The transformation of “crony socialism” (where the state favoured certain private players under a socialist guise) into “crony capitalism” post-1991 (where private players influence state policy for their benefit). This leads to inefficient resource allocation (e.g., 2G scam), erodes public trust, and deepens inequality.
    3. Argument: This perspective suggests that sustainable and inclusive economic development requires not just sound policies but also strong ethical foundations, transparent governance, and robust institutional integrity. Simply changing the economic model from socialist to capitalist is insufficient if the underlying moral and governance deficits are not addressed.

Graph View