GS Notes

6. Economics Notes 42

16 min read

Elaborate Notes

AGRICULTURE MARKETING

The process of agricultural marketing encompasses all activities, agencies, and policies involved in the movement of farm produce from the farms to the final consumers. Effective marketing is crucial not only for ensuring remunerative prices for farmers but also for making produce available to consumers at reasonable prices, thereby contributing to food security and economic stability.

  • Rationale for Advanced Agricultural Marketing:

    • Marketable Surplus: With advancements in agricultural technology and practices (e.g., the Green Revolution), Indian agriculture has transitioned from subsistence to a surplus-generating sector. A significant portion of the output, estimated at approximately 33% for food grains, pulses, and major cash crops like cotton and oilseeds, constitutes the ‘marketable surplus’. This is the quantity of produce that remains after meeting the farmer’s self-consumption and other on-farm needs (seed, feed, etc.). An efficient marketing system is imperative to handle this surplus and transfer it from production centers to consumption centers.
    • Income Enhancement: The primary objective of agricultural production is to generate income for farmers. The price realized by the farmer is a function of the marketing system’s efficiency. A system plagued by intermediaries, high transaction costs, and information asymmetry erodes the farmer’s share in the consumer’s rupee. Advanced marketing, through direct channels, better infrastructure, and transparent price discovery, directly enhances farm incomes.
    • Economic Growth and Industrialization: An improved marketing system acts as a catalyst for economic growth.
      • Price Stabilization: It ensures the distribution of agricultural products at lower and more stable prices to consumers. This helps in controlling food inflation, which has a significant bearing on the overall national income and purchasing power.
      • Agro-Based Industries: Efficient marketing provides strong backward linkages for agro-based industries, particularly in the food processing sector. A predictable and quality supply of raw materials encourages investment in these industries, fostering rural employment and economic diversification. The Ministry of Food Processing Industries has consistently highlighted the lack of efficient supply chains as a major bottleneck for the sector’s growth.

  • History of Agricultural Marketing in India:

    • Traditional System: For centuries, the agricultural marketing system in India was highly traditional and unorganized. Its primary characteristics included:
      • Village Sales: Farmers, especially small and marginal ones, often sold their produce to village traders or moneylenders (mahajans), often at pre-determined, low prices as part of debt obligations.
      • Post-Harvest Immediate Sales: Due to a lack of storage facilities and immediate need for cash to settle debts and meet household expenses, farmers were forced to sell their produce immediately after harvest. This resulted in a supply glut, causing prices to crash.
      • Malpractices: The system was rife with exploitative practices. The Royal Commission on Agriculture (1928), in its comprehensive report, meticulously documented these issues. It highlighted problems such as the use of non-standardized weights and measures, high marketing costs (including commissions, handling charges), and unauthorized deductions from the sale price under various pretexts (e.g., for charities, quality allowances). Scholar M.L. Dantwala in his works on Indian agricultural economics also extensively detailed the exploitative nature of the pre-reform marketing structure.

  • Regulated Markets (APMC System):

    • Genesis and Objective: Based on the recommendations of the Royal Commission (1928) and subsequent committees, the concept of regulated markets was introduced to reform the traditional system. The goal was to create orderly and transparent marketing conditions in designated market yards (mandis). After independence, states enacted their respective Agricultural Produce Market Regulation (APMR) Acts, which authorized the establishment of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) to manage these markets. The primary objective was to protect farmers from exploitation by intermediaries and ensure they received a fair price for their produce through open auctions.
    • Drawbacks of the APMC System: Over time, the regulated markets themselves developed significant inefficiencies and became barriers to free trade.
      1. Barrier to Direct Purchase: The APMC acts mandated that the first sale of specified agricultural produce could only occur in the designated mandi yards through licensed commission agents. This prevented processors, exporters, or large retailers from buying directly from farmers, adding layers of intermediaries and costs.
      2. State Monopoly on Markets: The acts vested the power to establish and operate markets solely with the state government, stifling private investment in market infrastructure like cold storages, warehouses, and logistics. This led to a perpetual infrastructure deficit.
      3. Cartelization: The licensing system for traders and commission agents (arthiyas) became restrictive. Over time, these licensed agents formed powerful cartels, often with deep-rooted connections to local political structures and based on caste affiliations. As documented by numerous studies, including those by the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP), these cartels collude to manipulate auctions and suppress prices, defeating the very purpose of the regulated market.
      4. Proliferation of Middlemen: Instead of reducing intermediaries, the system created a long chain from farmer to consumer, including village-level aggregators, commission agents, wholesalers, and retailers, with each adding their margin.
      5. Entry Barriers: The monopoly of licensed traders acted as a significant entry barrier for new entrepreneurs, preventing competition and innovation in agricultural marketing.
      6. Market Fragmentation: Each APMC acted as an independent market with its own set of rules and fees. The movement of goods from one APMC area to another, even within the same state, was often restricted or subject to multiple levies (mandi fees, cesses). This fragmentation prevented the creation of a unified state or national market, hindering the free flow of commodities and efficient price discovery.

MODEL APMC (AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKETING ACT), 2003

In response to the identified drawbacks of the existing APMC system, the central government formulated a model act in 2003 to guide states in reforming their respective legislations. It was a significant step towards market liberalization.

  • Key Provisions:
    • Establishment of Private Markets: It permitted private entities, farmer groups, and cooperatives to establish and operate their own markets, thereby breaking the state’s monopoly and fostering competition.
    • Contract Farming: The Act introduced specific provisions to facilitate and regulate contract farming arrangements. This allows corporate buyers or processors to enter into agreements with farmers for the production and supply of agricultural commodities under pre-agreed terms, providing farmers with an assured market and price.
    • Direct Marketing: It enabled farmers to sell their produce directly to processors, exporters, or bulk buyers outside the APMC yards, thereby reducing intermediaries and transaction costs.
    • Single-Point Levy: The model act proposed a single-point levy of market fees on the sale of notified commodities within a market area. This was intended to prevent the cascading effect of multiple taxes and fees as produce moves through the supply chain.
    • Special Markets: It allowed for the notification of special markets for specific commodities like flowers, fruits, and vegetables, which require specialized infrastructure and handling.
    • Infrastructure Development: A key provision was that the revenue earned by the APMC from market fees should be ploughed back into the development and maintenance of marketing infrastructure within the market area.
    • Dispute Resolution: The Act provided for a mechanism for resolving disputes that might arise in private markets or under contract farming agreements.

e-NAM (National Agriculture Market)

Launched in April 2016, e-NAM is a pan-India electronic trading portal that networks the existing APMC mandis to create a unified national market for agricultural commodities. It is a virtual market that leverages technology to overcome the physical and regulatory barriers of the traditional mandi system.

  • Implementing Agency: The Small Farmers’ Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC) is the lead agency designated by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer’s Welfare, Government of India, for implementing the e-NAM platform.
  • Need and Rationale: The need for e-NAM arose directly from the persistent failures of the APMC system.
    • Fragmented Markets: Despite model act reforms, most states continued to have fragmented markets, with each mandi operating in isolation. This prevented farmers from accessing a wider pool of buyers and realizing better prices.
    • Multiple Levies and Handling: The movement of produce across mandis involved multiple handling stages and the imposition of multiple market fees, which escalated the final price for the consumer without benefiting the farmer. e-NAM addresses these by creating a single, unified trading platform.
  • Pre-requisites for States: For a state’s APMCs to join the e-NAM platform, its APMC Act must be amended to provide for:
    1. Electronic Trading: A specific provision for online or electronic trading must be included.
    2. Single Trading License: A single license must be valid across all mandis within the state, allowing traders to operate and bid from anywhere.
    3. Single-Point Levy of Fee: A single-window levy of the transaction fee must be established at the point of the first sale.
  • Salient Features:
    • Online Showcase and Bidding: Farmers can bring their produce to the local e-NAM enabled mandi, where it is assayed for quality. The details are then uploaded to the portal, allowing registered traders from anywhere in the state or country to view the lot and place competitive bids online.
    • Single Window Service: The e-NAM portal acts as a comprehensive single window, providing information on commodity arrivals, quality reports, real-time prices, buy/sell offers, and facilitating e-payment settlement directly into the bank accounts of the farmers.
  • Benefits:
    1. Transparency: Online bidding removes the collusion and price manipulation often seen in physical auctions.
    2. Real-time Price Discovery: It enables price discovery based on actual demand and supply across a wider market area.
    3. Better Price Realization: Access to a larger number of buyers increases competition, leading to better prices for farmers’ produce.
    4. Reduced Transaction Costs: It streamlines the process for buyers, reducing their costs associated with sourcing produce from multiple locations.
    5. Consumer Benefits: Improved efficiency in the supply chain leads to more stable prices and better availability of commodities for consumers.
    6. Assured Transactions: The platform provides guarantees for both payment to the seller and delivery of goods to the buyer.
    7. Improved Reporting: Digital transactions ensure accurate and error-free recording and reporting of market data.

Balance of Payment (BoP)

The Balance of Payments is a systematic and summary record of all economic transactions between the residents of a country and the residents of the rest of the world during a specific period, typically a financial year.

  • Core Concepts:

    • Residents: This includes individuals, firms, and government bodies. The concept is based on the center of economic interest, not necessarily nationality.
    • Economic Transactions: These are transactions that involve the transfer of title or ownership of goods, services, money, and other assets.

  • Components of Economic Transactions:

    • Visible Items: These include the export and import of physical goods (merchandise). The balance of these transactions is known as the Balance of Trade (BoT).
    • Invisible Items: These are transactions that do not involve physical goods. They are further divided into:
      • Services: Trade in services like shipping, banking, insurance, tourism, and software services.
      • Factor Income: This includes investment income (profits, interest, dividends) from assets owned abroad and compensation to employees (wages and salaries earned by non-residents).
      • Unilateral Transfers: These are one-sided transfers or ‘receipts and payments without a quid pro quo’, such as foreign aid, grants, gifts, and private remittances sent by nationals working abroad.

  • Structure of BoP Account: The BoP account is structured like a standard double-entry bookkeeping system and is broadly divided into two main accounts:

    • Current Account: Records transactions in goods, services, factor income, and unilateral transfers. A surplus in the current account (Current Account Surplus) indicates that a country is a net lender to the rest of the world, while a deficit (Current Account Deficit - CAD) indicates it is a net borrower.
    • Capital Account: Records all international transactions of assets. This includes Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI), external borrowings (like commercial borrowings and government loans), and changes in foreign exchange reserves.

  • Double-Entry System:

    • Every transaction has two entries, a credit and a debit of equal value. By convention, any transaction resulting in an inflow of foreign currency is recorded as a credit (positive sign), and any transaction resulting in an outflow of foreign currency is recorded as a debit (negative sign).
    • Credit Items: Exports of goods and services, income received from abroad, transfer receipts, foreign investments (FDI/FPI), external borrowings, decrease in foreign assets.
    • Debit Items: Imports of goods and services, income paid to foreigners, transfer payments, investments made abroad, repayment of foreign loans, increase in foreign assets.
    • In accounting terms, the BoP always balances (Total Credits = Total Debits). A BoP ‘surplus’ or ‘deficit’ refers to the balance of autonomous transactions (current and capital account transactions done for their own sake) and is settled by accommodating transactions (changes in official foreign exchange reserves).
    Debit (Outflow of Foreign Exchange)Credit (Inflow of Foreign Exchange)
    Import of GoodsExport of Goods
    Import of Services (e.g., travel abroad)Export of Services (e.g., software)
    Factor Income paid abroad (e.g., profits of MNCs)Factor Income received from abroad
    Unilateral transfers to abroad (e.g., foreign aid given)Unilateral transfers from abroad (e.g., remittances)
    Indian investment abroad (Increase in assets)Foreign investment in India (FDI, FPI)
    Repayment of foreign loans (Decrease in liabilities)Borrowing from abroad

Prelims Pointers

  • Approximately 33% of India’s output of food grains, pulses, and cash crops is marketed surplus.
  • The Royal Commission on Agriculture pointed out problems in traditional marketing in its 1928 report.
  • Regulated Markets in India were established under the state-level Agricultural Produce Market Regulation (APMR) Acts.
  • The central government circulated the Model APMC Act in 2003 to guide state-level reforms.
  • Key provisions of the Model APMC Act, 2003, include allowing private markets, contract farming, and direct marketing.
  • e-NAM stands for National Agriculture Market.
  • e-NAM is a pan-India online trading platform for agricultural produce.
  • The lead implementing agency for e-NAM is the Small Farmers’ Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC).
  • e-NAM operates under the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer’s Welfare.
  • States joining e-NAM must amend their APMC acts to allow for electronic trading, a single trading license, and a single-point levy of market fees.
  • Balance of Payment (BoP) is a systematic record of all economic transactions between residents of a country and the rest of the world in a financial year.
  • Balance of Trade (BoT) refers to the balance of exports and imports of visible items (goods) only.
  • BoP uses a double-entry accounting system where all inflows are credited and all outflows are debited.
  • Credit items in BoP lead to an inflow of foreign currency (e.g., exports, FDI).
  • Debit items in BoP lead to an outflow of foreign currency (e.g., imports, investment abroad).
  • The two main components of the BoP account are the Current Account and the Capital Account.

Mains Insights

Agricultural Marketing

  1. Evolution and Paradox of the APMC System:

    • Cause: The APMC system was a state-led intervention to correct the market failure of the traditional, exploitative system highlighted by the Royal Commission (1928). The intent was noble: to protect farmers.
    • Effect (Unintended Consequences): Over decades, the system created legal monopolies, fostered cartelization by licensed agents (arthiyas), and became a major source of inefficiency. The very infrastructure meant to empower farmers became a tool for their exploitation, illustrating the ‘paradox of regulation’. This contributes significantly to agrarian distress, as farmers fail to get remunerative prices despite consumers paying high prices.

  2. Debate on Agricultural Market Reforms (APMC Reforms vs. Market Liberalization):

    • Viewpoint 1 (State-regulated Markets): Proponents argue that dismantling the APMC system without creating a robust alternative infrastructure would expose small and marginal farmers to exploitation by large corporations. They advocate for reforming APMCs by improving infrastructure, making governance more democratic, and breaking the trader-politician nexus.
    • Viewpoint 2 (Market Liberalization): This view, reflected in the Model APMC Act and the now-repealed Farm Acts, holds that competition is the only way to ensure efficiency. Allowing private markets, contract farming, and direct sales would create alternative channels, forcing APMCs to become more competitive and offer better services.
    • Analysis: The core challenge is not a binary choice between state and market, but finding a synergistic model where regulated APMCs coexist with competitive private markets, ensuring a level playing field and a safety net for farmers.

  3. e-NAM: A Technological Fix with Structural Challenges:

    • Potential (Cause-Effect): e-NAM is a transformative step towards creating ‘One Nation, One Market’. By leveraging technology, it aims to eliminate information asymmetry and break geographical barriers, leading to better price discovery for farmers.
    • Challenges (Analysis): The success of e-NAM is contingent on overcoming several ground-level challenges:
      • Infrastructure Gap: Lack of quality assaying, grading, and sorting facilities at the mandi level. Without standardized quality assessment, online bidding remains based on trust rather than objective criteria.
      • Digital Divide: Limited digital literacy among farmers and poor internet connectivity in rural areas hinder widespread adoption.
      • Logistical Hurdles: Even if a farmer in State A gets a good price from a buyer in State B, the absence of efficient, low-cost logistics and supply chains makes the physical transfer of goods unviable.
      • Resistance from Cartels: The powerful commission agent lobby actively resists the shift to a more transparent online system.

Balance of Payment

  1. BoP as a Barometer of Economic Health:

    • A country’s BoP statement is a critical indicator of its macroeconomic stability. A persistent Current Account Deficit (CAD) signals that a country’s expenditure exceeds its income, making it reliant on foreign capital inflows.
    • For India, the CAD is a key policy concern, primarily driven by high import bills for crude oil and gold. A widening CAD puts downward pressure on the Indian Rupee, can fuel imported inflation, and makes the economy vulnerable to external shocks (e.g., sudden stoppage of capital flows).

  2. Managing the Trilemma: Interplay between BoP, Exchange Rate, and Monetary Policy:

    • The ‘Impossible Trinity’ or Mundell-Fleming trilemma posits that a country cannot simultaneously have a fixed exchange rate, free capital movement, and an independent monetary policy.
    • India follows a managed float exchange rate and has a progressively liberalized capital account. Therefore, RBI’s monetary policy decisions are influenced by the BoP situation. For instance, to attract capital inflows and stabilize the rupee during a BoP crisis, the RBI might have to raise interest rates, which could be detrimental to domestic growth. This highlights the complex trade-offs policymakers face.

  3. Capital Account Convertibility Debate:

    • Context: This refers to the freedom to convert local financial assets into foreign financial assets and vice versa at market-determined exchange rates. India has full current account convertibility but partial capital account convertibility.
    • Arguments for (e.g., Tarapore Committee): Full convertibility could attract massive foreign investment, deepen financial markets, and improve economic efficiency.
    • Arguments Against: It could expose the economy to massive capital flight during times of uncertainty (as seen in the 1997 East Asian Financial Crisis), leading to extreme currency volatility and financial instability. The cautious, calibrated approach adopted by India is seen as a prudent strategy to balance the benefits of capital inflows with the risks of financial instability.

Graph View