5. Environment Notes 11

Based on the provided summary, here are the detailed UPSC notes in the requested format.

Elaborate Notes

IUCN Protected Area Categories

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has developed a global system of categorizing protected areas based on their management objectives. These categories are recognized by international bodies like the United Nations and are a benchmark for conservation efforts worldwide.

• Category IV: Habitat/Species Management Area

  • Primary Objective: To maintain, conserve, and restore particular species and habitats. These areas are subject to active and regular management interventions to address the requirements of specific species or to maintain habitats.
  • Management Focus: The conservation target is very specific. This could be a particular threatened species, such as the Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus), or a specific habitat, like a wetland crucial for migratory birds. As noted by conservation biologist Michael Soulé in his works on conservation biology (e.g., “What is Conservation Biology?”, 1985), such targeted efforts are crucial for keystone or endangered species whose survival is precarious.
  • Human Intervention: Unlike wilderness areas, these sites require deliberate intervention. This may include practices like habitat manipulation (e.g., controlled burning to maintain grasslands), supplementary feeding, or control of invasive species.
  • Context in India: This category aligns well with the objectives of most Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries and special projects.
    • Example: The National Chambal Gharial Wildlife Sanctuary, established in 1979, is a prime example. It is a tri-state protected area in northern India for the protection of the Critically Endangered Gharial, the Red-crowned roof turtle, and the Ganges river dolphin. Management here involves active monitoring of nesting sites and protection from illegal sand mining and fishing.
    • Similarly, Tiger Reserves and Elephant Sanctuaries, while part of the broader WLS/NP network, have management plans specifically focused on the needs of the tiger and elephant, respectively, fitting the criteria of Category IV.

• Category V: Protected Landscape/Seascape

  • Primary Objective: To protect and sustain important landscapes/seascapes and the associated nature conservation and other values created by interactions with humans through traditional management practices.
  • Core Concept: This category recognizes that human culture and the environment are often inextricably linked. It is not about preserving ‘pristine’ nature but about conserving areas where the harmonious interaction between people and nature has produced a landscape of significant ecological, biological, cultural, and scenic value. This concept is explored by scholars like Fikret Berkes in his work “Sacred Ecology” (1999), which highlights traditional ecological knowledge systems.
  • Characteristics: These areas often encompass a mosaic of natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Traditional, sustainable land-use practices (like terraced farming, traditional forestry, or pastoralism) are not only allowed but are often central to the area’s conservation.
  • Context in India:
    • Example: The Gulf of Mannar Biosphere Reserve is a fitting example. It is the first Marine Biosphere Reserve in South and Southeast Asia, established in 1989. The area’s rich coral reefs, seagrass beds, and mangroves are vital, but so are the traditional fishing communities whose livelihoods are dependent on the sustainable use of these resources. The management plan integrates community participation to protect both biodiversity and cultural heritage.
    • Many Conservation Reserves in India, which often include sacred groves and community-managed lands, also align with the principles of this category.

• Category VI: Protected Area with Sustainable use of Natural Resources

  • Primary Objective: To protect natural ecosystems and use natural resources sustainably, when conservation and sustainable use can be mutually beneficial.
  • Core Concept: This is the most people-centric IUCN category. It acknowledges that some ecosystems are managed effectively through sustainable, low-impact activities by local and indigenous communities. It is a move away from the “fortress conservation” model towards one that integrates traditional livelihoods.
  • Management: The model is based on a large-scale involvement of local communities, whose traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is considered a cornerstone of the management plan. While modern industrial-scale activities like mining or commercial logging are prohibited, low-level, non-industrial use of natural resources compatible with nature conservation is seen as a tool for conservation.
  • Context in India:
    • Community Reserves under the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, are the closest parallel. These reserves are managed in partnership with local communities on their own lands.
    • The principles of Joint Forest Management (JFM), introduced in India through the National Forest Policy of 1988, also resonate with this category’s objectives, emphasizing a partnership between the forest department and local communities for the management and protection of forests.

Protected Areas under the Wildlife (Protection) Act of India, 1972

The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 is the cornerstone of wildlife conservation legislation in India. It provides for the creation of a network of protected areas. The Act has been amended several times, notably in 2002, which introduced Conservation and Community Reserves.

• Wildlife Sanctuaries (WLS)

  • Legal Provision: Notified by the State Government under Section 18 of the WPA, 1972. The Central Government can also declare a sanctuary under certain conditions.
  • Objective: Primarily species-oriented conservation. Their aim is to create a protected habitat for a specific faunal species (e.g., the Great Indian Bustard Sanctuary in Solapur, Maharashtra).
  • Land Ownership: Can be established on government or private land. If private land is included, the rights of the owner are settled through acquisition and compensation determined by the District Collector.
  • Degree of Protection: A moderate level of protection. Certain human activities like grazing, collection of non-timber forest produce (NTFP), and other traditional rights may be permitted as long as they do not interfere with the well-being of wildlife. Boundary alteration requires a resolution from the state legislature.
  • Management: Headed by the Chief Wildlife Warden (CWW) of the state, who is supported by an Advisory Committee. This committee includes diverse representation from MLAs, NGOs, Panchayati Raj Institutions, etc., ensuring a multi-stakeholder approach.
  • Fact: The Andaman and Nicobar Islands have the highest number of Wildlife Sanctuaries in India (around 96).

• National Parks (NP)

  • Legal Provision: Notified by the State Government under Section 35 of the WPA, 1972.
  • Objective: Ecosystem-oriented conservation. They are established to protect the entire ecosystem, including its flora, fauna, landscape, and often historical or cultural objects.
  • Land Ownership: Always created from state-owned land. No private landholdings are permitted.
  • Degree of Protection: A very high level of protection. Almost all human activities, including grazing, forestry, and collection of NTFP, are strictly prohibited. The boundaries cannot be altered except by a resolution of the State Legislature, which requires prior recommendation from the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL).
  • Management: Managed by the CWW. Entry is highly restricted and is usually permitted only for specific purposes like approved tourism, scientific research, and photography.
  • Facts:
    • Largest: Hemis National Park, Ladakh (known for Snow Leopards).
    • Smallest: South Button Island National Park, Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
    • First: Hailey National Park (1936), now known as Jim Corbett National Park, Uttarakhand.

• Conservation Reserves

  • Legal Provision: Introduced through the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002. Notified by the State Government under Section 36A.
  • Objective: To act as buffer zones or connectors and migration corridors between established national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, and reserved/protected forests. They are crucial for mitigating habitat fragmentation.
  • Land Ownership: Established on government-owned land.
  • Management: Managed by a Conservation Reserve Management Committee, which includes representatives from the forest department, local village panchayats, and NGOs. This structure promotes a participatory approach.

• Community Reserves

  • Legal Provision: Introduced through the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002. Notified by the State Government under Section 36C.
  • Objective: To provide legal protection to flora and fauna on lands owned by an individual or a community who voluntarily consent to dedicate the area for conservation. It is a landmark step in empowering communities for conservation.
  • Land Ownership: Established on private or community lands.
  • Management: Managed by a Community Reserve Management Committee, where the community plays a central role. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the local community/individual and the State Forest Department formalizes the arrangement. The CWW of the state acts as the governing authority for the reserve.
  • Example: Kokkarebellur Community Reserve in Karnataka, where villagers have traditionally protected migratory painted storks and spot-billed pelicans that nest within their village.

Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme

• Genesis: Launched by UNESCO in 1971, the MAB programme is an intergovernmental scientific initiative.
• Core Philosophy: To establish a scientific basis for the improvement of relationships between people and their environments. It aims to reconcile the conservation of biodiversity with its sustainable use. As opposed to purely protectionist models, MAB promotes a holistic approach where local communities are partners in conservation.
• Structure of Biosphere Reserves: A key feature is the zoning model, designed to manage conflicting land uses:
  1. Core Area: A strictly protected zone (often a National Park or Sanctuary) dedicated to the conservation of landscapes, ecosystems, species, and genetic variation.
  2. Buffer Zone: Surrounds the core area. Activities compatible with sound ecological practices are allowed, such as scientific research, monitoring, training, and education. Eco-tourism is often promoted here.
  3. Transition Area: The outermost part where the greatest activity is allowed, fostering socio-culturally and ecologically sustainable economic and human activities. This is an area of active cooperation between reserve management and local people.

---

Prelims Pointers

• IUCN Category IV: Habitat/Species Management Area (e.g., National Chambal Gharial Sanctuary).
• IUCN Category V: Protected Landscape/Seascape (e.g., Gulf of Mannar Biosphere Reserve).
• IUCN Category VI: Protected Area with Sustainable Resource Use (aligns with India’s Community Reserves).
• Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: The primary legislation for creating protected areas in India.
• Conservation and Community Reserves: Introduced by the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act of 2002.
• Notifying Authority for WLS/NP: State Government. Central Government can also notify under specific circumstances.
• Boundary Alteration:
  • National Park: Requires recommendation of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) and a resolution by the State Legislature.
  • Wildlife Sanctuary: Requires a resolution by the State Legislature.
• Human Activity: Strictly prohibited in National Parks; regulated and permitted to a certain extent in Wildlife Sanctuaries.
• Land Ownership Claims: Settled by the District Collector in the case of a Wildlife Sanctuary.
• Management Head: Chief Wildlife Warden (CWW) of the state for both NPs and WLS.
• Conservation Reserves: On government land, often act as corridors.
• Community Reserves: On private/community land with community consent.
• Largest National Park: Hemis National Park (Ladakh).
• Smallest National Park: South Button Island National Park (Andaman & Nicobar).
• State with most WLS: Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
• Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme: Launched by UNESCO in 1971.
• Biosphere Reserve Zones: Core (strictest protection), Buffer (limited activity), Transition (sustainable development).

---

Mains Insights

1. Evolution of Conservation Paradigm: From Fortress to Participatory Models

   • Fortress Conservation: Early models, embodied by National Parks, often adopted an exclusionary approach, creating “inviolate” areas by relocating local communities. This sometimes led to social conflict and alienation of the very people who possessed traditional knowledge of the ecosystem.
   • Participatory Conservation: The introduction of Community Reserves and the principles of the Man and Biosphere (MAB) programme represent a significant shift. This model acknowledges that local and indigenous communities are crucial stakeholders, not obstacles. It leverages Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and aims to align conservation goals with livelihood security, as seen in the success of Community Reserves and Joint Forest Management (JFM) initiatives. This shift is crucial for long-term, sustainable conservation.

2. Protected Area Network: Addressing Habitat Fragmentation

   • Cause-Effect: Rapid urbanization, infrastructure development (highways, railways), and agricultural expansion lead to habitat fragmentation. This isolates wildlife populations, creating “islands of biodiversity,” which increases the risk of inbreeding, local extinction, and human-wildlife conflict as animals stray into human settlements.
   • Solution & Significance: Conservation Reserves are a direct policy response to this problem. By legally protecting corridors that connect larger protected areas like National Parks and Sanctuaries, they facilitate animal movement, ensure genetic exchange between populations, and maintain the ecological integrity of a larger landscape. They are a critical tool for landscape-level conservation planning.

3. Legal Framework and its Implementation Challenges

   • Strength: The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, provides a strong legal basis for conservation with a clear hierarchy of protected areas and designated authorities like the Chief Wildlife Warden and the National Board for Wildlife.
   • Weaknesses/Challenges:
     • Human-Wildlife Conflict: The boundaries of protected areas are often porous, leading to crop-raiding, livestock depredation, and human casualties, which in turn causes retaliatory killings of wildlife.
     • Development vs. Conservation: There is constant pressure to de-notify or divert protected area land for industrial, mining, and infrastructure projects. The role of the NBWL as a gatekeeper is often under scrutiny.
     • Inadequate Resources: Many protected areas face shortages of staff, funding, and modern equipment for monitoring and anti-poaching activities.
     • Encroachment and Rights: Issues related to the settlement of rights under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, within protected areas remain a complex and sensitive issue.

4. Community Reserves: A Double-Edged Sword?

   • Potential: They are a powerful tool for democratic, bottom-up conservation, empowering local communities and recognizing their stewardship. They can expand the conservation footprint beyond government-owned forests.
   • Debate/Concerns: Once an area is notified as a Community Reserve, land-use patterns are frozen, and authority shifts to the Chief Wildlife Warden. Some critics argue that this could undermine the very autonomy and traditional rights it seeks to protect if not implemented with genuine community partnership. The success hinges entirely on the sincerity of the MoU and the empowerment of the Community Reserve Management Committee.

---

Previous Year Questions

Prelims

1. (UPSC CSE 2023) In which one of the following regions is the Dhola-Sadiya Bridge located? (Although not directly about a PA, it relates to development in ecologically sensitive regions of the Northeast, home to many PAs) Correct Answer: This question is not directly related to PAs. A more relevant question would be: (UPSC CSE 2020) With reference to India’s Desert National Park, which of the following statements are correct?

   1. It is spread over two districts.
   2. There is no human habitation inside the Park.
   3. It is one of the natural habitats of the Great Indian Bustard. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

   Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only.

   • Explanation: The Desert National Park is located in Jaisalmer and Barmer districts of Rajasthan (Statement 1 is correct). It is a critical habitat for the Great Indian Bustard (Statement 3 is correct). However, there are several villages (Dhanis) inside the park, so there is human habitation (Statement 2 is incorrect).

2. (UPSC CSE 2020) Which of the following Protected Areas is well-known for the conservation of a sub-species of the swamp deer (Barasingha) that thrives well on hard ground and is exclusively graminivorous? (a) Kanha National Park (b) Manas National Park (c) Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary (d) Tal Chhapar Wildlife Sanctuary

   Answer: (a) Kanha National Park.

   • Explanation: Kanha National Park in Madhya Pradesh is famous for its successful conservation of the hard-ground swamp deer (Rucervus duvaucelii branderi), which was brought back from the brink of extinction.

3. (UPSC CSE 2019) Which one of the following is not a World Heritage Site? (a) Kaziranga National Park (b) Keoladeo National Park (c) Sundarbans National Park (d) Kanha National Park

   Answer: (d) Kanha National Park.

   • Explanation: Kaziranga, Keoladeo, and Sundarbans are all UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Kanha National Park is a Tiger Reserve but not a World Heritage Site.

4. (UPSC CSE 2022) Which of the following are the objectives of the ‘National Mission for a Green India’?

   1. Increasing the forest/tree cover on 5 million hectares of forest/non-forest lands and improving the quality of forest cover on another 5 million hectares.
   2. Improving/enhancing eco-system services like carbon sequestration and storage, hydrological services and biodiversity; along with provisioning services like fuel, fodder and timber and non-timber forest produces (NTFPs).
   3. Increasing forest-based livelihood income for about 3 million households. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

   Answer: (d) 1, 2 and 3.

   • Explanation: This question touches upon the broader goals of forest management and conservation, which are implemented through the protected area network and other initiatives like JFM. All three statements correctly list the objectives of the Green India Mission.

5. (UPSC CSE 2019) Consider the following statements about Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) in India:

   1. PVTGs reside in 18 States and one Union Territory.
   2. A stagnant or declining population is one of the criteria for determining PVTG status.
   3. There are 95 PVTGs officially notified in the country so far.
   4. Irular and Konda Reddi tribes are included in the list of PVTGs. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) 1, 2 and 4 (b) 2, 3 and 4 (c) 1, 2, 3 and 4 (d) 1, 3 and 4

   Answer: (a) 1, 2 and 4.

   • Explanation: While not directly about protected areas, this question is highly relevant to the “Mains Insights” discussion on participatory conservation and the Forest Rights Act. Many PVTGs reside in and around protected areas. Statement 3 is incorrect; there are 75 listed PVTGs, not 95.

Mains

1. (UPSC CSE 2022) Discuss the main objectives of Population Education and point out the measures to achieve them in India in detail. (This question can be linked to the pressure of population on protected areas)

   Answer: Introduction: Population education aims to create awareness about the relationship between population dynamics, quality of life, and sustainable development. Its main objectives are to help individuals make rational decisions about family size and population-related issues. Main Objectives:

   1. Awareness Building: To develop an understanding of the impact of population growth on natural resources, environment, and socio-economic development. This includes pressure on forests, water, and protected areas.
   2. Responsible Attitude: To foster a responsible attitude towards family size, gender equality, and reproductive health.
   3. Informed Decision-Making: To provide knowledge about family planning methods and the benefits of a small family norm.
   4. Sustainable Development: To link population stability with the goals of environmental conservation and sustainable resource use. Measures to Achieve them in India:
   5. Integration into Curriculum: Incorporating population studies into the formal education system at school and college levels.
   6. Mass Media Campaigns: Using television, radio, and social media for campaigns like “Hum Do, Humare Do” to spread awareness.
   7. Role of Health Workers: Utilizing the network of ASHA workers and Anganwadi centers to provide counselling and services at the grassroots level.
   8. Incentivizing Small Families: Schemes that provide financial and other benefits for couples adopting permanent family planning methods after two children.
   9. Women Empowerment: Improving female literacy, providing employment opportunities, and raising the age of marriage are the most effective long-term measures, as empowered women tend to have smaller, healthier families. Conclusion: Achieving population stability is crucial for India to reduce pressure on its natural heritage, including its protected areas, and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

2. (UPSC CSE 2020) What are the key features of the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) initiated by the Government of India? (Environmental governance question, linked to overall ecosystem health)

   Answer: The National Clean Air Programme (NCAP), launched in 2019, is a national-level strategy to tackle air pollution. Key Features:

   1. Time-bound Target: Aims to reduce the concentration of coarse (PM10) and fine (PM2.5) particles by 20–30% by 2024, with 2017 as the base year.
   2. City-Specific Action Plans: Focuses on 131 non-attainment cities (which consistently violate national air quality standards) to formulate and implement city-specific action plans.
   3. Multi-Sectoral Approach: Addresses various sources of pollution, including vehicular emissions, industrial pollution, dust management, and burning of biomass and garbage.
   4. Collaborative Framework: Involves collaboration between central ministries (MoEFCC, Transport, Power), state governments, local bodies, and technical institutions.
   5. Monitoring and Reporting: Aims to expand the air quality monitoring network across the country and to establish a robust system for public reporting and data dissemination.
   6. Awareness and Capacity Building: Focuses on public awareness campaigns and building the capacity of urban local bodies and pollution control boards to implement the plans effectively.

3. (UPSC CSE 2019) What is a wetland? Explain the Ramsar concept of ‘wise use’ in the context of wetland conservation. Cite two examples of Ramsar sites from India.

   Answer: Wetland: As defined by the Ramsar Convention, a wetland is an area of marsh, fen, peatland, or water, whether natural or artificial, permanent or temporary, with water that is static or flowing, fresh, brackish, or salt, including areas of marine water the depth of which at low tide does not exceed six meters. Ramsar Concept of ‘Wise Use’: The ‘wise use’ of wetlands is defined as “the maintenance of their ecological character, achieved through the implementation of ecosystem approaches, within the context of sustainable development.”

   • It is not about complete prohibition of use but about ensuring that human use is sustainable and does not degrade the wetland’s ecological functions and values.
   • It involves integrating wetland conservation into national planning, promoting community participation, and developing policies that support the ecosystem services provided by wetlands (e.g., water purification, flood control, biodiversity habitat). Examples of Ramsar Sites in India:
   1. Chilika Lake, Odisha: A brackish water lagoon, it is a critical habitat for a large number of migratory birds (like at Nalabana WLS within it) and supports the livelihood of a large fishing community. Its management plan integrates conservation with sustainable fisheries.
   2. Keoladeo National Park, Rajasthan: A man-made and man-managed wetland and one of the most important bird wintering areas in the world. Its ‘wise use’ involves careful management of water levels to maintain the habitat for nesting and migratory birds, while also supporting tourism.

4. Discuss the rationale behind the introduction of Conservation Reserves and Community Reserves in the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. How do they supplement the existing protected area network? (Hypothetical question based on the topic)

   Answer: Introduction: The Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002, introduced two new categories of protected areas—Conservation Reserves and Community Reserves—marking a significant shift in India’s conservation policy towards a more inclusive and landscape-based approach. Rationale for Introduction:

   1. Addressing Fragmentation: The existing network of National Parks and Sanctuaries often existed as isolated islands. There was a need to protect crucial wildlife corridors and buffer areas that were outside this network but vital for animal movement and genetic exchange.
   2. Recognizing Community Role: There was a growing realization that top-down, exclusionary conservation models were unsustainable. There was a need for a legal framework to empower and involve communities who were willing to participate in conservation on their own lands.
   3. Expanding Conservation Footprint: A vast amount of biodiversity exists outside traditional PAs, on government revenue lands and private/community lands. These new categories provided a mechanism to bring such areas under a conservation framework without the strict regulations of a Sanctuary or NP. How they Supplement the Existing Network:
   4. Conservation Reserves as Corridors: They act as “green corridors” connecting larger protected areas. This allows species like tigers and elephants to move between habitats, reducing human-wildlife conflict and preventing population isolation. They supplement the core habitats (NPs/WLS) by ensuring landscape-level connectivity.
   5. Community Reserves as Buffers: They often act as buffer zones around major PAs, absorbing anthropogenic pressures and providing a softer edge between strictly protected areas and human-dominated landscapes.
   6. Inculcating a Sense of Ownership: By involving communities in management, these reserves foster a sense of local stewardship, making conservation a shared responsibility rather than a purely state-run enterprise. This supplements the enforcement-based protection in NPs and WLS with a socially-driven model. Conclusion: Conservation and Community Reserves are vital additions that make India’s protected area network more robust, connected, and socially inclusive, moving from isolated pockets of protection to an integrated conservation landscape.

5. The Man and Biosphere (MAB) programme offers a unique model for reconciling biodiversity conservation with sustainable human development. Elaborate with reference to the structure and functioning of Biosphere Reserves in India. (Hypothetical question based on the topic)

   Answer: Introduction: UNESCO’s Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme, launched in 1971, provides a framework for creating Biosphere Reserves (BRs) which are learning sites for sustainable development. They aim to balance biodiversity conservation, economic development, and cultural values, offering a unique model that goes beyond traditional protected areas. Reconciliation through Zonation Structure: The core strength of the MAB model lies in its three-zone structure, which is designed to manage and reconcile conflicting activities:

   1. Core Area: This is a legally protected zone, often a National Park or Wildlife Sanctuary (e.g., the core of the Nilgiri BR is composed of Mudumalai, Bandipur NPs). It is dedicated to strict biodiversity conservation and is kept free from human disturbance, thus fulfilling the primary conservation objective.
   2. Buffer Zone: This area surrounds the core and is managed to protect it from adverse impacts. Activities compatible with conservation, such as eco-tourism, environmental education, and scientific research, are permitted. This zone reconciles conservation with low-impact economic activities and knowledge generation. For instance, in the Gulf of Mannar BR, the buffer zone allows for regulated fishing and research on coral reefs.
   3. Transition Area: This is the outermost zone of human settlement and activity. Here, the focus is on fostering sustainable development in partnership with local communities. Activities like sustainable agriculture, agroforestry, and small-scale enterprises are promoted. The management collaborates with local communities, panchayats, and NGOs to ensure that economic development does not compromise ecological integrity. This is the zone of active human-nature co-existence and cooperation. Functioning in the Indian Context: In India, Biosphere Reserves like the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve (the first in India) and the Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve demonstrate this model.
   • They integrate multiple protected areas (NPs, WLS) within a single management framework.
   • They actively involve local communities and tribal groups (like the Todas in Nilgiris) in conservation and livelihood programmes.
   • They serve as sites for long-term ecological research and monitoring, providing valuable data for sustainable management policies. Conclusion: The MAB programme’s Biosphere Reserve model is a pragmatic and holistic approach. By spatially separating activities through its zonation strategy and emphasizing community partnership in the transition zone, it effectively demonstrates that biodiversity conservation and sustainable human development are not mutually exclusive but can be mutually reinforcing goals.