GS Notes

8. Ethics Notes 03

20 min read

Elaborate Notes

Laws and Ethics: The Interplay

Laws and Ethics are two fundamental frameworks that govern human behaviour, though they operate on different principles and have distinct origins. While often complementary, they can also exist in a state of tension.

  • Norms as Precursors to Law: Societal norms are informal, unwritten rules of behaviour that emerge organically from social interactions and are enforced through social pressure, such as praise, ridicule, or ostracism. As societies become more complex, a need arises for more formal, explicit, and universally applicable rules. The codification and formal enforcement of these core norms by a state or governing authority lead to the creation of Laws. Thus, law can be seen as the highest evolutionary stage of a norm, endowed with state sanction.

  • The Function of Law: The primary purpose of law is to establish a minimum enforceable standard of behaviour that applies uniformly to all members of a society, regardless of their personal ethical beliefs. It aims to create social order, protect individual rights, resolve disputes, and control behaviour deemed harmful or immoral by the collective consensus. As articulated by legal positivists like John Austin (1790-1859), law is a command of the sovereign backed by the threat of a sanction. Its validity comes from its source of authority, not necessarily its moral content.

  • The Domain of Ethics: Ethics, or moral philosophy, delves into what is right or wrong, good or bad. It provides a moral compass for individuals and groups. Unlike law, which presents a single, enforceable standard, ethics can offer multiple, often conflicting, answers depending on the philosophical framework applied (e.g., Deontology, Consequentialism, Virtue Ethics). Ethics often governs areas where the law is silent, such as personal promises, charity, or loyalty. It serves as the first line of defence against deviant behaviour, operating through an individual’s conscience and sense of duty, whereas law is typically remedial and reactive, intervening only after a transgression has occurred.

  • The Law-Culture Interface: Sociologist Andre Beteille in his work on Indian society, notably in “Society and Politics in India: Essays in a Comparative Perspective” (1991), highlights the dynamic between law and culture. He posits that while law prescribes the direction a society should move, it is the underlying culture—the shared values, beliefs, and practices—that determines the direction it actually moves. This explains why laws aimed at social reform (e.g., anti-dowry laws, laws against untouchability) often face significant challenges in implementation due to deep-rooted cultural norms.

The Matrix of Law and Ethics

The relationship between law and ethics can be understood through a four-quadrant framework:

  • Legal and Ethical: This quadrant represents actions that are both legally permissible and widely considered morally right. They form the bedrock of a just society.

    • Example: The Right to Education Act, 2009, which makes education a fundamental right for children aged 6-14, is legally mandated and universally regarded as ethical, promoting human development and equality.
    • Example: The Prohibition of Child Labour Act, 1986 (amended in 2016) is another example, protecting children from exploitation, a goal that is both a legal and ethical imperative.

  • Legal but Unethical: This category includes actions permitted by law but questioned on moral grounds by significant sections of society. This often leads to intense social and political debate.

    • Example: Capital Punishment. While legal in India for the “rarest of the rare” cases (as established in Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, 1980), many ethicists and human rights advocates argue it is unethical, citing the sanctity of life and the possibility of judicial error.
    • Example: Passive Euthanasia. The Supreme Court, in the landmark Aruna Shanbaug case (2011) and later in its Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) judgment, legalized passive euthanasia through ‘living wills’. While legal, the ethics of intentionally withholding treatment to end a life remains a subject of profound moral debate.
    • Example: Altruistic Surrogacy (as permitted by the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021) is legal but raises ethical questions about the potential exploitation of women’s bodies, even without commercial intent.

  • Ethical but Illegal: This involves actions that are considered morally right or justifiable under certain circumstances but are prohibited by law. This often highlights a gap between rigid legal codes and nuanced ethical considerations.

    • Example: A person breaking a traffic signal to rush a critically injured accident victim to the hospital. The act is illegal (violating traffic law) but ethically justifiable under the principle of saving a life. This is a classic example of the conflict between rule-based ethics (deontology) and outcome-based ethics (consequentialism).
    • Example: A starving child stealing bread to feed their family. While theft is illegal, many ethical systems, particularly those focused on human dignity and need, would argue for the moral permissibility of the act in such dire circumstances. Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables famously explores this very dilemma.

  • Neither Legal Nor Ethical: These are actions universally condemned by both law and societal morality as they cause significant harm to individuals and the social fabric.

    • Example: Human Trafficking. It is a heinous crime under Indian law (e.g., Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956) and universally considered a grave violation of fundamental human rights and dignity.
    • Example: Child Sexual Abuse. Protected under stringent laws like the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, this act is unequivocally illegal and abhorrent from every ethical standpoint.

Socialization: The Process of Value Inculcation

Socialization is the lifelong process through which individuals learn and internalize the values, beliefs, norms, and social skills of their culture, enabling them to function as members of society. As described by sociologists Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann in The Social Construction of Reality (1966), it is the process by which an individual is inducted into a society’s objective world.

Mechanisms of Socialization

  • Observational Learning: This mechanism, central to Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory (1977), posits that individuals learn by observing and imitating the behaviour of others, known as social role models (e.g., parents, teachers, peers, public figures). Bandura’s famous Bobo doll experiment (1961) demonstrated that children who observed an adult acting aggressively towards a doll were more likely to replicate that behaviour. Hero-worshipping and the reflection of parental mannerisms in children are common examples.

  • Rewards and Punishment (Operant Conditioning): This is a direct method of shaping behaviour. Desirable conduct is encouraged through rewards (positive reinforcement), while undesirable conduct is discouraged through punishment (negative reinforcement). This concept is a cornerstone of B.F. Skinner’s theory of Operant Conditioning.

    • Sanskritization of Corruption: This is a metaphorical adaptation of sociologist M.N. Srinivas’s concept of ‘Sanskritization’ (where lower castes emulate the customs of upper castes to improve their social standing). In this context, it refers to a societal pathology where corruption, instead of being punished, is seen as a means to rapid upward mobility and social status, leading to its emulation by others.
    • Broken Window Theory: Proposed by criminologists James Q. Wilson and George Kelling (1982), this theory suggests that visible signs of crime and civil disorder (like a broken window) create an environment that encourages further, more serious crime. If petty transgressions are not reprimanded (punished), it signals that larger violations will also be tolerated.

  • Role-Taking: Developed by sociologist George Herbert Mead as part of his theory of the social self, role-taking is the process of mentally assuming the perspective of another person to understand their feelings and anticipate their reactions. This fosters empathy and allows individuals to modify their behaviour appropriately. It is a powerful tool for moral development, as seen in educational programs where children play the roles of historical figures to inculcate patriotism, or in prison reform programs designed to help inmates understand the impact of their actions on victims.

  • Trial and Error: This is a fundamental learning process where individuals learn from their own direct experiences, retaining behaviours that lead to successful outcomes and abandoning those that do not.

Agencies of Socialization

These are the institutions and groups that influence an individual’s social and moral development.

  • Family: The family is the primary and most influential agency of socialization. It is an informal agency that socializes children during their formative years, establishing the foundational value system.
    • Parenting Styles: Based on the work of psychologist Diana Baumrind (1960s), parenting styles significantly impact a child’s development.
      • Autocratic (Authoritarian): Characterized by high demands and low responsiveness. Parents impose strict rules without explanation, and power distance is high. This can lead to children who are either overly compliant, submissive, and lacking in confidence, or rebellious, hostile, and self-centered.
      • Democratic (Authoritative): Characterized by high demands and high responsiveness. Parents set clear standards but are rational, communicative, and receptive to feedback. This style, based on trust and mutual respect, tends to foster children who are rational, optimistic, courageous, and tolerant.
      • Permissive (Indulgent): Characterized by low demands and high responsiveness. Parents are lenient and give children excessive freedom without setting firm limits. This can result in children who lack self-control and exhibit apathy, indifference, and a higher propensity for disapproved behaviour.
    • Role of the Mother (Attachment Theory): Based on John Bowlby’s Attachment Theory (1950s), the mother’s role is crucial.
      • Secure Attachment: Develops when mothering is consistent, and the relationship is based on trust and responsiveness to the child’s needs. Children with secure attachments tend to develop high achievement orientation, courage, rationality, and leadership qualities.
      • Insecure Attachment: Develops from inconsistent, neglectful, or overly indulgent mothering. This can lead to children who lack compassion and courage, have a high dependency, and are more susceptible to associating with anti-social elements. The lives of great leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, and Abraham Lincoln often reveal the profound positive influence of their mothers in shaping their character and values.
    • Role of the Father: Modern research, including guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO), emphasizes that the involvement of both parents is critical for a child’s holistic development, especially in the first 1000 days. The father traditionally plays a key role in teaching gender-appropriate behaviour to boys and helping girls make healthy heterosexual adjustments. The inspirational roles played by the fathers of the Phogat sisters (Mahavir Singh Phogat) and Gunjan Saxena are powerful contemporary examples of fathers fostering exceptional talent and breaking gender stereotypes.

Prelims Pointers

  • Norms: Informal, unwritten societal guidelines for behaviour.
  • Laws: Formal, codified norms enforced by a state authority with sanctions.
  • Andre Beteille: A sociologist who stated that law shows where society should go, but culture determines where it actually goes.
  • Legal vs. Ethical Confrontations:
    • Legal & Ethical: Right to Education Act, 2009.
    • Legal but Unethical: Capital Punishment, Passive Euthanasia.
    • Ethical but Illegal: Breaking traffic law to save a life.
    • Neither Legal nor Ethical: Human Trafficking, POCSO Act violations.
  • Landmark Judgments:
    • Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980): Established the “rarest of the rare” doctrine for capital punishment.
    • Aruna Shanbaug Case (2011) & Common Cause v. Union of India (2018): Legalized passive euthanasia in India.
  • Socialization: The lifelong process of inducting an individual into the culture of a society.
  • Mechanisms of Socialization:
    • Observational Learning: Linked to Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory and the Bobo doll experiment.
    • Reward and Punishment: Linked to B.F. Skinner’s theory of Operant Conditioning.
    • Role-Taking: A concept developed by sociologist George Herbert Mead.
  • Broken Window Theory: Proposed by James Q. Wilson and George Kelling. States that visible signs of disorder encourage more serious crime.
  • Agencies of Socialization: Family, Education System, Media, Peer Group, Religion.
  • Parenting Styles: A concept primarily developed by Diana Baumrind.
    1. Authoritarian (Autocratic): High demand, low response.
    2. Authoritative (Democratic): High demand, high response.
    3. Permissive: Low demand, high response.
  • Attachment Theory: Developed by John Bowlby, explaining the importance of the mother-child bond (secure vs. insecure attachment).

Mains Insights

GS Paper I (Indian Society):

  1. Role of Family in Perpetuating Social Norms: The family, as the primary agent of socialization, is crucial in transmitting both positive values (like respect, cooperation) and negative norms (like patriarchy, caste prejudice, dowry). An autocratic parenting style, for instance, can perpetuate a culture of unquestioning obedience, hindering critical thinking and social reform.
  2. Socialization and Social Change: While socialization ensures cultural continuity, it can also be a vehicle for social change. The role of fathers like Mahavir Singh Phogat demonstrates how challenging traditional gender roles within the family can lead to broader societal shifts. Education and media act as secondary agents that can challenge and modify values learned in the family.
  3. Globalization and its Impact on Socialization: Globalization introduces diverse cultural values through media and peer groups, often conflicting with traditional values inculcated by the family. This can lead to inter-generational conflict and identity crises among youth but can also foster more tolerant and cosmopolitan values.

GS Paper II (Polity & Governance):

  1. Gap between Law and Societal Ethics: The effectiveness of any law depends on its social acceptance. Laws that are far ahead of societal ethics (e.g., initially, the law legalizing widow remarriage) or those that lag behind evolving ethics (e.g., debates on marital rape) face immense implementation challenges. This highlights the need for social persuasion and awareness campaigns to accompany legal reforms.
  2. Ethical Governance: The quote by Andre Beteille is highly relevant for governance. Policymakers must not only frame laws but also understand the cultural context to ensure their effective implementation. A law’s success is contingent on its ability to align with or gradually reshape cultural norms.
  3. Judicial Activism and Evolving Ethics: The Supreme Court’s judgments on passive euthanasia, privacy (as a fundamental right), and decriminalization of homosexuality (Navtej Singh Johar case) reflect the judiciary’s role in aligning law with evolving societal morality and constitutional ethics, often stepping in when the legislature is hesitant.

GS Paper IV (Ethics, Integrity, and Aptitude):

  1. Conscience vs. Law for Civil Servants: Public servants often face dilemmas where a rule or law may appear to lead to an unethical outcome (legal but unethical). In such cases, their conscience, guided by foundational values like compassion and justice, becomes a critical guide. They must navigate such situations by exploring discretionary spaces, seeking guidance from superiors, or documenting their ethical concerns, while upholding the spirit of the law.
  2. Importance of Socialization in Building an Ethical Society: Understanding the mechanisms of socialization is key to formulating policies for value education. Promoting democratic parenting, incorporating role-taking exercises in school curricula, and ensuring positive role models in media can help cultivate an ethical citizenry from a young age.
  3. Emotional Intelligence and Role-Taking: The mechanism of role-taking is directly linked to empathy, a core component of Emotional Intelligence. For a civil servant, the ability to take the role of a citizen—especially the most vulnerable—is essential for responsive, compassionate, and effective public service delivery.
  4. The Broken Window Theory in Administration: This theory can be applied to public administration. Tolerating minor instances of corruption or inefficiency can create a culture where larger transgressions become normalized. Therefore, maintaining high standards of integrity and discipline, even in seemingly small matters, is crucial for preventing systemic decay.

Previous Year Questions

Prelims

  1. Which one of the following statements best reflects the Chief purpose of the ‘Constitution’ of a country? (UPSC CSE 2023) (a) It determines the form of government. (b) It creates a political office and a legislature. (c) It defines and limits the powers of government. (d) It secures social justice, social equality and social security. Answer: (c) [Note: While all are functions, the chief purpose is to create a framework that defines and limits state power, which is the foundational legal and ethical document of a nation.]

  2. In India, which one of the following compiles information on industrial disputes, closures, retrenchments and lay-offs in factories employing workers? (UPSC CSE 2022) (a) Central Statistics Office (b) Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (c) Labour Bureau (d) National Technical Manpower Information System Answer: (c) [Note: This question relates to the formal systems (laws and institutions) that govern social relations in the economic sphere, an extension of the topic of laws regulating society.]

  3. With reference to India, consider the following statements: (UPSC CSE 2021)

    1. When a prisoner makes out a sufficient case, parole cannot be denied to such prisoner because it becomes a matter of his/her right.
    2. State Governments have their own Prisoners Release on Parole Rules. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Answer: (b) [Note: This relates to the application of law and discretion. Parole is not a right. This highlights the ethical dilemma of reform vs. punishment within the legal framework.]

  4. The ‘Right to Privacy’ is protected as an intrinsic part of the ‘Right to Life and Personal Liberty’. Which of the following in the Constitution of India correctly and appropriately implies the above statement? (UPSC CSE 2018) (a) Article 14 and the provisions under the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution. (b) Article 17 and the Directive Principles of State Policy in Part IV. (c) Article 21 and the freedoms guaranteed in Part III. (d) Article 24 and the provisions under the 44th Amendment to the Constitution. Answer: (c) [Note: The question links a fundamental ethical concept (privacy) to its legal basis in the Constitution (Article 21), a direct intersection of law and ethics discussed in the summary.]

  5. With reference to the provisions contained in Part IV of the Constitution of India, which of the following statements is/are correct? (UPSC CSE 2020)

    1. They shall be enforceable by courts.
    2. They shall not be enforceable by any court.
    3. The principles laid down in this part are to influence the making of laws by the State. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 2 and 3 only Answer: (d) [Note: DPSPs are the ethical and moral conscience of the Constitution, guiding the state in law-making, even though they are not legally enforceable, perfectly illustrating the relationship between ethical ideals and legal instruments.]

Mains

  1. What are the main components of Emotional Intelligence (EI)? Can they be learned? Discuss. (UPSC GS-IV 2020) Answer Pointers:

    • Introduction: Define Emotional Intelligence as the ability to perceive, understand, manage, and use emotions, citing Daniel Goleman’s model.
    • Main Components (Goleman’s Model):
      1. Self-Awareness: Knowing one’s own emotions, strengths, and weaknesses.
      2. Self-Regulation: Controlling or redirecting disruptive impulses and moods.
      3. Motivation: A passion for work that goes beyond money or status.
      4. Empathy: The ability to understand the emotional makeup of other people. This directly connects to the concept of ‘Role-Taking’ discussed in socialization.
      5. Social Skills: Proficiency in managing relationships and building networks.
    • Can EI be Learned?: Argue affirmatively. Unlike IQ, EI is not fixed. It can be developed through conscious effort, practice, and training. Mention methods like mindfulness, self-reflection, feedback, and experiential learning (like role-playing). Link this to the mechanisms of socialization—observational learning (from emotionally intelligent mentors) and role-taking can enhance empathy.
    • Conclusion: Conclude by highlighting the importance of EI for personal success and especially for public servants in ensuring compassionate and effective governance.

  2. What is the role of family, society and educational institutions in inculcating values? (UPSC GS-IV 2021) Answer Pointers:

    • Introduction: Define values as enduring beliefs about what is good and desirable. State that values are primarily inculcated through the process of socialization.
    • Role of Family: Explain that it is the primary agency. Discuss the impact of parenting styles (autocratic, democratic, permissive) on value formation. Mention the specific values learned: love, respect, sacrifice, obedience. Use examples like the mothers of great personalities.
    • Role of Society: Explain society’s role through peer groups, community, and culture. Discuss how societal norms and sanctions (reward and punishment) shape behaviour. Mention concepts like ‘sanskritization of corruption’ as a negative example and community-led initiatives as a positive one.
    • Role of Educational Institutions: These are formal agencies for value transmission. Discuss the role of curriculum (moral science classes, stories of great leaders), teachers as role models (observational learning), and extracurricular activities (sports teaching teamwork, discipline).
    • Conclusion: Conclude that while all three are crucial, a synergetic and consistent approach across these agencies is necessary for the holistic moral development of an individual.

  3. “The rules and regulations provided to a public servant are a framework, but he/she has to take decisions using his/her discretion.” Critically examine. (UPSC GS-IV 2022) Answer Pointers:

    • Introduction: Acknowledge that rules and laws form the backbone of administration, ensuring uniformity and preventing arbitrariness. However, they cannot foresee every eventuality.
    • Importance of Framework (Rules): Prevents abuse of power, ensures accountability (as per Weberian bureaucracy), provides clarity and predictability.
    • Need for Discretion: Rules can be rigid, silent, or conflicting. Real-world situations are complex and require context-specific application. A public servant must use discretion to achieve the spirit of the law, which is public welfare. This is where ethics and conscience guide the law.
    • Ethical Use of Discretion: Discretion should be guided by constitutional values (justice, equality), emotional intelligence (empathy for the citizen), and ethical principles (utilitarianism, deontology). It should not be for personal gain.
    • Critical Examination: The challenge lies in balancing the two. Unfettered discretion can lead to corruption and nepotism, while blind adherence to rules can lead to red-tapism and injustice (a ‘legal but unethical’ outcome).
    • Conclusion: Conclude that a public servant must be ‘rule-bound’ but not ‘rule-blind’. Training in ethical frameworks and emotional intelligence is essential to equip them to use discretion wisely and for the public good.

  4. What do you understand by the term ‘good governance’? How far have recent initiatives in India succeeded in providing this? (UPSC GS-IV 2019) Answer Pointers:

    • Introduction: Define ‘good governance’ based on the principles outlined by the UN, including accountability, transparency, rule of law, responsiveness, participation, and equity. Emphasize that it is an ethical and effective form of governance.
    • Connection to Law and Ethics: Good governance is where the law is not just present but is also just, equitable, and implemented impartially. It’s the practical manifestation of an ethical legal framework.
    • Recent Initiatives in India and their Success:
      • Right to Information (RTI): Promotes transparency and accountability. (Success: Exposed corruption; Limitation: Delays, protection of whistleblowers).
      • Digital India: Enhances efficiency and responsiveness (e.g., DBT). (Success: Reduced leakages; Limitation: Digital divide).
      • GST: Promotes economic integration and formalization (Rule of Law in economy). (Success: Formalization; Limitation: Complexity for small businesses).
      • Citizen’s Charters: Aims for accountability and time-bound service delivery. (Success: Creates awareness; Limitation: Often not enforced, lack of punitive measures).
    • Conclusion: Conclude that while India has taken significant strides, the gap between the ‘law’ (initiatives) and the ‘culture’ (implementation challenges, corruption) remains. Continuous institutional reform and strengthening of ethical culture are needed to fully realize the goals of good governance.

  5. Differentiate between ‘Code of Ethics’ and ‘Code of Conduct’ with suitable examples. (UPSC GS-IV 2018) Answer Pointers:

    • Introduction: Define both as tools to guide the behaviour of professionals and members of an organization.
    • Code of Conduct:
      • Nature: Specific, prescriptive, and action-oriented. It is a set of rules outlining what is permissible and what is forbidden. Focuses on ‘what to do’ and ‘what not to do’.
      • Scope: Deals with specific actions and compliance. Often legalistic.
      • Enforcement: Violations lead to specific penalties or punishments.
      • Example: The Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964, which prohibits officials from accepting expensive gifts or participating in political activities.
    • Code of Ethics:
      • Nature: General, aspirational, and value-based. It outlines the principles and values an organization or profession believes in. Focuses on ‘why’ certain actions are right or wrong.
      • Scope: Guides decision-making and professional judgment in complex situations where rules may be silent.
      • Enforcement: Violation is not always directly punishable by law but can lead to professional sanctions or loss of reputation.
      • Example: The Nolan Committee’s Seven Principles of Public Life (Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openness, Honesty, and Leadership). These are ethical guidelines for all public servants.
    • Conclusion: A Code of Conduct sets the minimum standard of behaviour (the ‘law’), while a Code of Ethics provides the moral compass to aspire to higher standards and navigate grey areas. Both are essential for a robust ethical framework in public service.

Graph View