GS Notes

8. Ethics Notes 10

15 min read

Elaborate Notes

MORAL AND POLITICAL ATTITUDE

  • Moral Attitude

    • A moral attitude is an individual’s disposition towards an object, person, or situation, which is grounded in their deep-seated moral convictions about what constitutes right and wrong. It is not merely a preference but a judgment rooted in principles of righteousness and ethical reasoning. This attitude is a key component of an individual’s character and guides their behaviour, especially in situations with ethical implications.
    • It reflects a composite of several elements:
      • (a) Individual’s opinion concerning morality: This pertains to an individual’s ethical framework. For instance, one person might adopt a deontological perspective, as articulated by Immanuel Kant in his “Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals” (1785), believing that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their consequences (e.g., “telling the truth is always right”). Another might follow a utilitarian framework, proposed by thinkers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, judging the morality of an action based on its outcome—the greatest good for the greatest number.
      • (b) Individual attitude towards moral lapses: This reveals how a person reacts to their own or others’ ethical failures. A strong moral attitude might lead to feelings of guilt or a desire for restitution, a phenomenon explained by Leon Festinger’s theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957), where a conflict between belief (e.g., “I am an honest person”) and action (e.g., “I lied”) creates psychological discomfort that motivates a change in behaviour or belief.
      • (c) Individual behaviour when confronted with moral dilemmas: This is the practical application of one’s moral attitude. Classic ethical thought experiments, such as the Trolley Problem (first introduced by Philippa Foot in 1967) or Lawrence Kohlberg’s Heinz Dilemma, are designed to explore the reasoning behind an individual’s choices when moral values are in conflict.
    • The formation of moral attitudes is a continuous process of socialization, heavily influenced by primary and secondary agents:
      • Family: As the primary agent, the family lays the foundation of a child’s moral compass through instruction, observation, and reinforcement.
      • Education: Educational institutions play a formal role in shaping moral attitudes through curriculum (e.g., value education, civics) and the institutional environment. The National Education Policy 2020 in India, for example, emphasizes the development of ethical and moral values.
      • Religion: Religious traditions provide comprehensive moral codes (e.g., the Ten Commandments in Christianity, the concept of Dharma in Hinduism, the Five Precepts in Buddhism) that guide the attitudes and behaviours of their followers.

  • Attributes of People with Moral Attitude

    • (a) Reverence: This is a profound respect for the inherent worth and dignity of others. It goes beyond mere tolerance. For example, the Indian tradition of greeting with folded hands (Namaste) signifies respect for the divinity within another person. In a political context, reverence is manifested by abiding by constitutional principles, a concept Dr. B.R. Ambedkar termed ‘constitutional morality’. It also involves fostering an environment of constructive dissent, respecting differing viewpoints as valuable for democratic discourse.
    • (b) Faithfulness: This attribute signifies steadfast loyalty and fidelity to one’s commitments, principles, and relationships, irrespective of temptations or adverse circumstances. Examples include marital fidelity, where partners remain loyal to their vows, or a civil servant who, bound by their oath of office, refuses lucrative bribes and upholds integrity. This is a core tenet of the ethical principle of fidelity.
    • (c) Awareness of responsibility: A person with a strong moral attitude is acutely conscious of their duties and obligations. The sociologist Max Weber, in his essay “Politics as a Vocation” (1919), distinguished between an ‘ethic of conviction’ and an ‘ethic of responsibility’, arguing that public officials must primarily be guided by the latter, considering the foreseeable consequences of their actions. Examples include a parent’s responsibility for the holistic development of their child, an administrator’s duty to ensure transparent and efficient governance, and a citizen’s responsibility to participate in and strengthen the democratic process.
    • (d) Veracity: This is the quality of being truthful and honest. In the contemporary digital age, this attribute has gained immense significance. The world is grappling with the “post-truth” phenomenon, a term that became prominent around 2016, denoting circumstances where objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief. As the philosopher Hannah Arendt explored in works like “Truth and Politics” (1967), the deliberate blurring of lines between fact and fiction poses a grave threat to political life. Veracity requires a commitment to truth even when it is inconvenient.
    • (e) Goodness: This is a comprehensive character trait encompassing a range of virtues. It includes qualities like generosity, kindness, and compassion (Karuna in Buddhist philosophy), which motivate altruistic behaviour. It also includes sacrifice for the greater good and forgiveness, as exemplified by leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela, who used forgiveness as a tool for social and political reconciliation. In Aristotelian ethics, such virtues are essential for achieving Eudaimonia, or human flourishing.

  • Political Attitude

    • Political attitude refers to the set of beliefs, feelings, and evaluations an individual holds regarding political entities such as political parties, ideologies, leaders, and the overall political system. It is often shaped by a pragmatic calculation of perceived personal or group-level gains and losses. Understanding these attitudes is crucial in political science as they are strong predictors of political behaviour, most notably voting patterns.

  • Factors influencing the political attitude of an individual

    • (a) Political Ideologies: An ideology is a coherent set of ideas and beliefs that explains how society should work and offers a blueprint for a certain social order. Ideologies like liberalism (emphasizing individual rights), socialism (focusing on collective welfare and state control), and conservatism (valuing tradition and order) provide frameworks through which individuals interpret political issues and decide their stance on the distribution of power.
    • (b) Charismatic leadership: As identified by Max Weber as one of the three forms of legitimate authority, charismatic leadership relies on the exceptional personal qualities and appeal of a leader. Such leaders can inspire deep devotion and fundamentally shape the political attitudes of their followers, often transcending party lines or ideological commitments.
    • (c) Intention and Performance of Political Parties: The credibility of a political party and its leadership heavily influences public attitude. This involves evaluating the gap between promises made in manifestos and their actual implementation (“walking the talk”). Consistent delivery on developmental policies and programs builds trust and positive attitudes, while failure erodes them.
    • (d) Class positioning of the individual: A person’s socio-economic status significantly shapes their political attitude. Individuals from lower economic strata (the ‘have-nots’) are more likely to support a welfare state model with redistributive policies like subsidies, freebies, and Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT). This aligns with the Marxist analysis of society, which posits that class interest is a primary driver of political affiliation.
    • (e) Caste and Religion: The Indian political scientist Rajni Kothari, in his seminal work “Caste in Indian Politics” (1970), argued that in India, caste is a central axis of political mobilization. He described two interrelated processes: the “politicization of caste,” where caste groups organize themselves as political blocs to demand resources and power, and the “casteization of politics,” where the political process itself becomes infused with caste considerations. Similarly, religion remains a powerful determinant of political attitudes and voting behaviour.
    • (f) Agencies of Socialization: Political attitudes are transmitted through various agents. The family is the first and often most influential source of political orientation. Peer groups and reference groups (groups to which an individual aspires to belong) also shape and modify these attitudes.
    • (g) Media: The media plays a critical role in setting the public agenda and framing political issues, thereby influencing attitudes. The political scientist Steven Lukes, in “Power: A Radical View” (1974), described this as the ‘second face of power’—the ability to decide what gets debated. The rise of social media has further complicated this, creating echo chambers and filter bubbles that can reinforce existing attitudes and make them more extreme.
    • (h) Demographic Factors: Variables like age, gender, and region also correlate with political attitudes. For instance, younger populations are often more receptive to social and political change, while older generations may prefer the stability of the status quo. This “generation gap” can lead to different political priorities and allegiances.

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE

  • Emotion

    • Emotion is a complex psycho-physiological experience of an individual’s state of mind as it interacts with biochemical and environmental influences. It is a multifaceted experience involving a subjective feeling, cognitive appraisal (interpretation of the situation), physiological responses (e.g., increased heart rate), and expressive behaviours (e.g., smiling, frowning).
    • The American psychologist Paul Ekman’s research in the 1970s identified six basic emotions (happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disgust, surprise) that he proposed were universally recognized across cultures.
    • Types of Emotion:
      • Primary and Secondary Emotions: A primary emotion is the initial, direct emotional reaction to a stimulus (e.g., feeling fear upon seeing a threat). A secondary emotion is an emotional reaction to the primary emotion or to one’s thoughts about it (e.g., feeling ashamed for being afraid, or feeling angry about being hurt). This distinction is crucial in therapeutic approaches like Emotion-Focused Therapy, developed by Leslie Greenberg.
      • Positive and Negative Emotions: Positive emotions (e.g., joy, gratitude, love) are generally pleasant and are associated with well-being and psychological growth. Barbara Fredrickson’s Broaden-and-Build Theory (2001) suggests that positive emotions broaden an individual’s momentary thought-action repertoires and build enduring personal resources. Negative emotions (e.g., hatred, greed, anger), while often unpleasant, have evolutionary utility as they signal threats and motivate self-preservation.
    • The traditional Western philosophical view, often traced back to Plato, saw emotions as disruptive forces that must be controlled by reason. However, contemporary research has overturned this myth. Neuroscientist Antonio Damasio, in his book “Descartes’ Error” (1994), demonstrated through studies of patients with brain damage that a lack of emotion can impair rational decision-making. This proves that emotions are not a hindrance but an integral component of reasoning, helping to assign value to options and motivate action. Therefore, the challenge lies not in the emotions themselves, but in the ability to manage them effectively.

  • Emotional Intelligence (EI)

    • The term “Emotional Intelligence” was first formally defined in a 1990 academic paper by Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer. They defined it as “the ability to monitor one’s own and others’ feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this information to guide one’s thinking and actions.” Essentially, EI is the capacity to reason with and about emotions.
    • The concept was popularized by psychologist and author Daniel Goleman in his influential 1995 book, “Emotional Intelligence.” Goleman’s framework breaks down EI into the ability to identify, understand, use, and manage emotions in self and others for positive outcomes, such as:
      • (a) To relieve stress: By understanding emotional triggers.
      • (b) To communicate effectively: By being attuned to the emotional subtext of conversations.
      • (c) To empathize with others: By recognizing and understanding their emotional states.
      • (d) To diffuse conflict: By managing one’s own and others’ negative emotions.
      • (e) To develop interpersonal relations: By building trust and rapport.
    • Goleman famously claimed that at work, emotional intelligence can be twice as important as technical skills and IQ for jobs at all levels, and that for top leadership positions, nearly 90% of the difference is attributable to EI. While the exact figures are debated, the core argument that EI is a critical determinant of workplace success and leadership effectiveness is widely accepted.

  • Building Blocks of Emotional Intelligence

    • Daniel Goleman’s model outlines five key components of EI. The first three relate to self-management, while the last two relate to managing relationships.
      • (a) Self-awareness
      • (b) Self-regulation
      • (c) Self-motivation
      • (d) Empathy
      • (e) Social skills
    • Self-Awareness
      • This is the foundational competence of EI. As the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle stated, “Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom.” It involves a deep understanding of one’s own emotions, strengths, weaknesses, needs, and drives.
      • Components of self-awareness include:
        • (a) Awareness of one’s strengths and weaknesses: A self-aware individual can be honest with themselves about their capabilities. This leads to realistic goal-setting, increasing the likelihood of achievement, which in turn boosts self-confidence and motivation.
        • (b) Awareness of one’s motivation: Understanding what truly drives you helps in aligning personal values with professional roles, leading to greater job satisfaction and resilience during setbacks.
        • (c) Awareness of one’s responsibility: This is the moral dimension of self-awareness, recognizing one’s duties and the impact of one’s actions on others, which is the bedrock of integrity.
      • Benefits of Self-Awareness:
        • (a) Self-evaluation: A self-aware person is open to constructive feedback and can accurately assess their performance, facilitating continuous improvement.
        • (b) Focus and Resilience: Understanding one’s core motivations provides an internal anchor that helps maintain focus and persevere through challenges.
        • (c) Realistic Expectations: Being aware of personal and organizational limitations prevents the setting of unrealistic goals that can lead to failure and demotivation.
        • (d) Empathy and Sensitivity: Recognizing one’s own vulnerabilities and struggles makes it easier to understand and empathize with others in similar situations.
        • (e) Locus of Control: Self-awareness helps in distinguishing between factors that are within one’s control and those that are not, allowing for a more effective allocation of energy and reducing stress. This relates to Julian B. Rotter’s concept of an internal locus of control, where individuals believe they have control over the outcomes of events in their lives.

Prelims Pointers

  • Moral Attitude: An individual’s stance based on moral convictions about right and wrong.
  • Post-truth: A situation where public opinion is shaped more by emotion and personal belief than by objective facts.
  • Lawrence Kohlberg: Known for his theory of stages of moral development, often using the ‘Heinz Dilemma’.
  • Immanuel Kant: Proponent of deontological ethics (duty-based).
  • Jeremy Bentham & J.S. Mill: Proponents of utilitarianism (greatest good for the greatest number).
  • Rajni Kothari: Coined the terms ‘politicization of caste’ and ‘casteization of politics’ in his book “Caste in Indian Politics” (1970).
  • Max Weber: Identified three types of authority: traditional, rational-legal, and charismatic. Also discussed the ‘ethic of responsibility’.
  • Steven Lukes: Described the ‘second face of power’ as the ability to set the political agenda and prevent issues from being debated.
  • Emotion: A complex state involving physiological, cognitive, and situational variables.
  • Paul Ekman: Identified six basic, universal emotions.
  • Primary Emotion: The direct emotional response to a situation.
  • Secondary Emotion: The emotional response to a primary emotion.
  • Emotional Intelligence (EI): Coined by Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer in 1990.
  • Daniel Goleman: Popularized the concept of EI with his 1995 book; proposed five building blocks of EI.
  • Goleman’s Five Components of EI: Self-awareness, Self-regulation, Self-motivation, Empathy, and Social skills.
  • Aristotle: Stated, “Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom.”
  • Antonio Damasio: His research showed that emotion is essential for rational decision-making.

Mains Insights

  • GS Paper IV (Ethics): The Interplay of Moral and Political Attitudes

    • Relationship: While distinct, moral and political attitudes are deeply intertwined. A person’s moral framework (e.g., belief in equality, justice) often shapes their political ideology and party preference. However, a conflict can arise when political expediency (pragmatism based on political gain) clashes with moral principles. An ethical administrator must navigate this by grounding their political neutrality in a strong moral commitment to constitutional values.
    • Dilemma: Can a political attitude be amoral? Some political theories, like political realism, argue that politics operates in a sphere separate from conventional morality. However, from an ethical governance perspective, a political attitude devoid of a moral compass can lead to corruption, cronyism, and injustice. Public service demands that political attitudes be subservient to moral duties.

  • GS Paper I (Society) & GS Paper II (Polity): Identity Politics in India

    • Historiographical View: Rajni Kothari’s analysis of caste as central to Indian politics remains highly influential. The debate continues whether this is a sign of democratic deepening (as marginalized groups find a political voice) or a fragmentation of the national identity.
    • Cause and Effect: The politicization of caste has led to increased political representation for lower castes but has also been criticized for reinforcing caste identities and, at times, prioritizing caste-based demands over broader developmental goals. Recent election trends suggest a complex interplay where voters consider factors like development and leadership alongside traditional identity markers.

  • GS Paper IV (Ethics): Emotional Intelligence in Administration

    • Application: EI is not a ‘soft skill’ but a core competency for administrators.
      1. Self-awareness: Helps an officer recognize their own biases and prejudices, ensuring impartial decision-making.
      2. Self-regulation: Crucial for maintaining composure and integrity under pressure, resisting corruption, and managing the stress inherent in public service.
      3. Empathy: Essential for understanding the needs of diverse populations, especially the vulnerable, leading to more inclusive and citizen-centric policies.
      4. Social Skills: Needed for effective team leadership, inter-departmental coordination, negotiation, and conflict resolution with stakeholders.
    • Debate: Rationality vs. Emotion: The traditional administrative model, influenced by Max Weber’s bureaucracy, emphasized impersonal rationality. The modern view, informed by EI, argues that ‘compassionate administration’ is more effective. The challenge is not to eliminate emotion but to harness it intelligently, ensuring that empathy informs decisions without compromising objectivity and the rule of law. Self-awareness is the key to striking this balance.

  • GS Paper II & III (Governance, Security): The Challenge of the ‘Post-Truth’ Era

    • Impact on Governance: The proliferation of fake news and disinformation erodes trust in public institutions, polarizes society, and can incite violence. This makes it difficult to build consensus for public policies and maintain social harmony.
    • Solutions: Addressing this requires a multi-pronged strategy: strengthening fact-checking mechanisms, promoting media literacy through education, enacting robust legal frameworks against malicious disinformation (while protecting free speech), and promoting transparency in government communication to build public trust. Veracity, as a moral attribute, becomes a crucial civic and administrative virtue.

Graph View