GS Notes

1.3 - World History Notes 02

19 min read

Elaborate Notes

INDUSTRIALIZATION IN EUROPE

Industrialization signifies the transition from agrarian, handicraft-based economies to economies dominated by industry and machine manufacturing. This process, which began in Great Britain in the late 18th century, spread across continental Europe at varying paces and with distinct national characteristics.

  • The Phased Spread of Industrialization:

    • First Stage (c. 1760-1850): This phase was pioneered by Great Britain. It subsequently spread to neighboring countries like Belgium, France, and parts of Germany. This stage was characterized by innovations in textiles (e.g., Spinning Jenny, Power Loom), steam power (James Watt’s steam engine, 1776), and iron production.
    • Second Stage (c. 1870-1914): This phase saw the rise of new industrial powers, including a unified Germany, the United States, and Japan. It was characterized by advancements in steel (Bessemer process), chemicals, electricity, and the internal combustion engine. This is often referred to as the “Second Industrial Revolution.”

  • Delayed Industrialization in Iberia (Portugal and Spain):

    • The industrialization process in Spain and Portugal was exceptionally slow and limited. Several factors contributed to this lag.
    • Agrarian Backwardness: Both nations retained semi-feudal agrarian structures with low productivity, which limited capital accumulation and the creation of a domestic market for industrial goods.
    • Policy of Bullionism: A core tenet of early mercantilism, bullionism equated a nation’s wealth with its holdings of precious metals (gold and silver). Spain and Portugal, with their vast American colonies, focused on extracting bullion rather than investing in productive domestic industries. As critiqued by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations (1776), this focus on accumulation rather than circulation and production stifled economic development. This reliance created an illusion of wealth while the real economy, including manufacturing and agriculture, stagnated.

  • France:

    • French industrialization was more gradual than Britain’s and was heavily influenced by state intervention.
    • Jean-Baptiste Colbert (1619-1683): As the finance minister to King Louis XIV, Colbert implemented a state-directed mercantilist policy known as Colbertism. He promoted French luxury industries like glass (founding the Saint-Gobain company), tapestries (Gobelins Manufactory), and silk (in Lyon), along with wine processing, to create a positive balance of trade. While this occurred pre-Industrial Revolution, it laid a foundation for skilled craftsmanship and state support for industry.
    • Resource Exploitation: The rich coal and iron ore deposits in the Alsace-Lorraine region were crucial for the development of French heavy industry, particularly after the Napoleonic era. This region became a point of contention and was annexed by Germany in 1871, a significant blow to French industry, and later returned after World War I.
    • Role of Huguenots: The Huguenots (French Calvinist Protestants) were a highly skilled and industrious minority, prominent in textiles, finance, and crafts. Their persecution and the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 by Louis XIV led to a mass exodus, causing a significant “brain drain” that benefited countries like England, Prussia, and the Netherlands. Those who remained continued to contribute to France’s economic life where possible.

  • Germany:

    • Despite political fragmentation before 1871, several German states began to industrialize early, particularly Prussia.
    • Role of Junkers and Protestants: The Junkers, the landowning aristocracy of Prussia, were instrumental in promoting agricultural modernization, which freed up labor for industries. The Protestant work ethic, as later theorized by Max Weber in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905), emphasized diligence and frugality, which may have contributed to capital accumulation and industrial drive.
    • Cameralism: This was a German school of public administration and economic thought, which viewed the state as the primary engine of economic development. It advocated for the rational and centralized management of a state’s resources (Kammer) to increase state power and revenue. This state-led approach prioritized efficiency, resource utilization, and development, laying the groundwork for industrialization.
    • Key Industries and Resources: Germany’s industrial might was built on coal and steel. The Ruhr and Saar Valleys contained vast coal deposits, fueling rapid growth in mining and heavy industry. Shipbuilding also became a major sector.
    • Post-Unification (1871): Under the leadership of Otto von Bismarck and later, Germany’s industrialization accelerated dramatically. The state actively protected infant industries with tariffs and promoted scientific and technical education. Under Hitler’s Third Reich (1933-1945), industry was fully mobilized for rearmament and war, representing a peak of production, albeit for destructive ends.
    • Colonial Ambitions: As a latecomer to industrialization, a unified Germany entered the “Scramble for Africa” seeking raw materials and markets. It established colonies like Togoland and German South-West Africa (Namibia), often clashing with British and French interests. In Asia, it secured a lease on the port of Kiaochow (Jiaozhou) in the Shantung (Shandong) Peninsula in China in 1898.
    • Resource Annexation: Hitler’s expansionist policies were driven by industrial needs. The Anschluss (annexation) of Austria in 1938 gave Germany control over Austrian iron ore and other resources. The subsequent occupation of Czechoslovakia and influence over Romania secured access to the latter’s crucial oil fields at Ploiești.

  • Italy:

    • Industrialization in Italy was hampered by significant obstacles.
    • Disunity and Regional Disparity: Before unification in 1861, Italy was a collection of disparate states. Even after unification, a stark economic divide persisted between the industrializing North (Piedmont, Lombardy) and the agrarian, impoverished South (Mezzogiorno). A lack of key resources like coal also posed a challenge.
    • Early Industries: Initial efforts focused on textiles, particularly silk, and processing agricultural products like wine.
    • Mussolini and Fascist Industrialization: Under Benito Mussolini’s Fascist regime (1922-1943), Italy saw a push for industrial self-sufficiency (autarky). His policy of Syndicatism (or more accurately, Corporatism) was central to this. The state organized each branch of industry into a “corporation” comprising both employers and employees. Ostensibly to end class conflict and promote national interest, this system effectively suppressed independent trade unions and gave the state immense control over the economy. Major public works projects and investment in heavy industry were undertaken.
    • Colonialism: Emulating other powers, Fascist Italy aggressively pursued a colonial empire in Africa to secure resources and national prestige, conquering Ethiopia (1935-36) and expanding its control over Libya and Somalia. It clashed with France over influence in Tunisia.

  • Sweden:

    • Sweden’s industrialization path was distinct, leveraging its specific resources and social structure.
    • Religious and Cultural Factors: As a Protestant nation, particularly influenced by Calvinist ideas, its culture was conducive to commerce and capital accumulation.
    • Key Industries: Sweden’s industrialization, which took off in the mid-19th century, was initially financed by a sophisticated banking sector. It leveraged its vast forests for timber and pulp, its high-grade iron ore, and its engineering talent. This led to the development of world-class industries in shipbuilding, steel production (e.g., Sandvik), and later, engineering (e.g., Ericsson, Volvo).

RUSSIA

Russia’s industrialization was late, state-driven, and occurred in dramatic bursts rather than a gradual evolution.

  • Pre-Revolutionary Russia:

    • Feudal Structure: Until the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 by Tsar Alexander II, Russia was fundamentally a feudal society. This system tied peasants to the land, preventing the formation of a mobile industrial workforce.
    • Challenges: Key obstacles included a vast geography with poor infrastructure, a lack of capital, a small entrepreneurial class, and insufficient arable land to create a large agricultural surplus.
    • Early State-Led Efforts:
      • Peter the Great (r. 1682-1725): As part of his Westernization campaign, Peter established state-owned factories, particularly for military supplies (arms, ships, uniforms), and encouraged mining in the Ural Mountains.
      • Catherine the Great (r. 1762-1796): She continued these policies, encouraging private enterprise and foreign investment, though the economy remained overwhelmingly agrarian.
      • Late 19th Century: Finance Minister Sergei Witte spearheaded a major industrialization drive in the 1890s, focusing on railway construction (e.g., the Trans-Siberian Railway) and heavy industry, largely financed by foreign loans (especially from France).

  • Post-Revolutionary (Soviet) Industrialization:

    • Stalin’s Vision: After the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP) allowed for some market mechanisms. However, Joseph Stalin, who came to power in the late 1920s, believed rapid, forced industrialization was essential for the USSR to overcome its backwardness and defend itself against capitalist powers. His slogan was “We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or we shall be crushed.”
    • Capital Formation: To finance this, Stalin implemented the forced collectivization of agriculture beginning in 1928. Private farms were consolidated into state-controlled collective farms (kolkhozy). This was intended to increase grain production for export (to buy machinery) and to control the food supply for the growing urban workforce. It resulted in catastrophic famines, such as the Holodomor in Ukraine (1932-33), and the death of millions.
    • Five-Year Plans: The vehicle for this industrialization was a series of centralized Five-Year Plans (the first from 1928-1932). These plans, formulated by the state planning agency Gosplan, set ambitious quotas for every sector of the economy, prioritizing heavy industry (coal, steel, electricity, machinery) over consumer goods. This “command economy” model achieved staggering increases in industrial output but at an immense human cost.

AMERICA

The United States transformed from an exploited colony to the world’s leading industrial power in just over a century.

  • Colonial Era and Mercantilism:

    • Prior to the American War of Independence (1775-1783), the Thirteen Colonies were subject to British mercantilist policies designed to benefit the mother country.
    • Navigation Acts (from 1651): This series of laws stipulated that colonial trade must be conducted on British ships, and certain “enumerated goods” (like tobacco and sugar) could only be shipped to England.
    • Industrial Restrictions: Acts like the Iron Act of 1750 prohibited the colonies from building new iron finishing facilities, forcing them to export raw pig iron to Britain and import finished iron products. This was intended to keep the colonies as a dependent source of raw materials and a market for British manufactures.
    • Trade Restrictions: Direct trade with other European nations was largely forbidden, forcing commerce to pass through British ports.

  • Post-Independence Industrialization:

    • After achieving independence with the Treaty of Paris (1783), the U.S. embarked on rapid industrialization, aided by several factors:
      • Vast Natural Resources: An abundance of land, timber, coal, iron, and later, oil.
      • Labor Supply: High birth rates and massive waves of immigration from Europe provided a large workforce.
      • Technological Innovation: A culture of invention, exemplified by Eli Whitney’s cotton gin (1793) and interchangeable parts, and later by figures like Thomas Edison and Henry Ford.
      • Capital: Domestic savings and significant foreign investment, particularly from Britain.
      • Infrastructure: The government and private enterprise invested heavily in canals, roads, and especially railroads, which integrated the vast country into a single national market.
    • Key Industries: Early industrialization centered in the Northeast (textiles, shipbuilding). This expanded to include gold mining (California Gold Rush, 1849), food processing (Chicago’s meatpacking industry), steel (pioneered by Andrew Carnegie), and oil (John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil). By the end of the 19th century, the U.S. had surpassed Britain as the world’s leading industrial producer.

JAPANESE INDUSTRIALIZATION

Japan’s industrialization is a unique case of a non-Western nation rapidly modernizing in response to external pressure, without being colonized.

  • Pre-Conditions:

    • Unlike many Asian nations, Japan was never colonized, meaning its resources were not drained by a foreign power. It maintained its political sovereignty and social cohesion.
    • The Tokugawa period (1603-1868) had created a highly urbanized society with a sophisticated market economy and high literacy rates, providing a strong foundation for modernization.

  • The Meiji Restoration (1868):

    • The Catalyst: The arrival of a U.S. naval squadron under Commodore Matthew Perry in 1853-54 forcibly opened Japan to foreign trade through the Convention of Kanagawa. This event shattered Japan’s self-imposed isolation (sakoku) and exposed its military vulnerability.
    • Political Revolution: This shock led to the overthrow of the Tokugawa Shogunate and the “restoration” of direct imperial rule under Emperor Meiji in 1868. The new Meiji leaders recognized that to resist Western imperialism, Japan had to adopt Western technology and institutions. Their guiding principle was Fukoku kyōhei (富国強兵 - “Enrich the country, strengthen the military”).
    • A Unique Collective Effort: The modernization drive was a national project, led by the state and embraced by various segments of society, from the former samurai class who became administrators and entrepreneurs to the common people. It was not driven by a single class but by a national consensus on the need to modernize for survival.

  • Methods of Industrialization:

    • Learning from the West: The Meiji government dispatched missions, like the Iwakura Mission (1871-73), to Europe and the U.S. to study their political, economic, and military systems. It actively translated Western scientific and technical literature.
    • Education and Human Capital: It sent promising students abroad and hired foreign experts (o-yatoi gaikokujin) to teach in Japan, rapidly building a domestic class of skilled engineers and technicians. A universal education system was established.
    • State-Led Development: The government established “model factories” in strategic sectors like shipbuilding, munitions, and textiles. Once these were operational and profitable, they were sold off, often at very low prices, to private entrepreneurs.
    • Finance: The National Bank of Japan was established to provide a stable currency and channel capital towards industry, offering loans at subsidized rates.
    • Rise of the Zaibatsu: This policy of privatizing state industries led to the rise of powerful industrial and financial conglomerates known as Zaibatsu (e.g., Mitsubishi, Mitsui, Sumitomo, Yasuda). These family-controlled groups dominated the Japanese economy, controlling everything from banking and mining to shipping and manufacturing.
    • Imperialism: Like its Western counterparts, industrialized Japan pursued an imperialist foreign policy to secure raw materials and markets. This led to the First Sino-Japanese War (1894-95), where Japan gained control of Taiwan (Formosa), and the Russo-Japanese War (1904-05), where it defeated a major European power and gained influence over Korea and Manchuria.
    • Cultural Ethos: A strong work ethic, emphasis on loyalty to the company and nation, and a culture that values collective effort and precision have been cited as key cultural factors underpinning Japan’s industrial success.

EFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

The Industrial Revolution was a watershed moment in human history, profoundly reshaping society, economy, and politics.

  • Economic Transformation:

    • Rise of the Factory System: Production moved from homes and small workshops (the domestic or “putting-out” system) to large, centralized factories. This allowed for mass production, division of labor, and greater efficiency.
    • Decline of Guild and Domestic Systems: Artisan guilds and independent craft producers could not compete with the low cost and high volume of machine-made goods, leading to their decline.
    • New Class Structure: Society was restructured along new economic lines.
      • The Industrial Bourgeoisie (Capitalists): The owners of the means of production (factories, machines, capital).
      • The Proletariat (Working Class): A new class of wage laborers who owned nothing but their labor power, which they sold to the capitalists. This class dynamic was famously analyzed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in works like The Communist Manifesto (1848).
    • Capitalism and Inequality: The factory system and private ownership of capital concentrated wealth in the hands of a few, leading to unprecedented economic inequality and a widening gap between the rich and the poor.

  • Political and Geopolitical Consequences:

    • Imperialism: The voracious appetite of industries for raw materials (cotton, rubber, minerals) and the need for new markets for finished goods fueled the “New Imperialism” of the late 19th century. European nations, and later the U.S. and Japan, scrambled to colonize vast territories in Asia and Africa.
    • Inter-Imperialist Rivalry: Competition for colonies and economic dominance created intense rivalries, such as between Britain and France in Africa, and Britain and Germany globally. Historians like J.A. Hobson (Imperialism: A Study, 1902) and V.I. Lenin (Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, 1917) argued that this competition was an inherent feature of capitalist development and a primary cause of international conflict, culminating in World War I.

  • Socio-Economic Consequences:

    • Urbanization: The factory system drew millions from the countryside to cities, leading to explosive, unplanned urban growth. This resulted in overcrowding, poor sanitation, and the spread of diseases in industrial cities like Manchester and Liverpool.
    • Neglect of Agriculture: In many industrializing nations, particularly Britain, agriculture was relatively neglected in favor of industry. This created a dependency on food imports from colonies and other agricultural nations.
    • Beginnings of Globalization: The new industrial economy created a global division of labor. Industrialized nations in Europe and North America became the “workshops of the world,” producing manufactured goods, while colonies and other regions in Asia, Africa, and Latin America were relegated to the role of suppliers of raw materials and foodstuffs. This complex network of dependency and exchange marked the beginning of the modern globalized economy.

Prelims Pointers

  • Bullionism: An economic policy equating a nation’s wealth with its reserves of gold and silver. Practiced by Spain and Portugal.
  • Jean-Baptiste Colbert: Finance minister of King Louis XIV of France; architect of French mercantilism, known as Colbertism.
  • Huguenots: French Protestants who were skilled artisans and merchants; their persecution led to a “brain drain” from France.
  • Alsace-Lorraine: A region rich in coal and iron, contested between France and Germany.
  • Junkers: The landowning aristocracy of Prussia (Germany).
  • Cameralism: A German variant of mercantilism focused on efficient state administration and resource management to strengthen the state.
  • Saar Valley / Ruhr Valley: Major coal-producing regions vital to German industrialization.
  • Shantung (Shandong): A province in China where Germany established a colonial foothold in 1898.
  • Syndicatism/Corporatism: Mussolini’s economic policy in Italy, which organized industry into state-controlled “corporations” of employers and workers to suppress class conflict.
  • Peter the Great: Russian Tsar (r. 1682-1725) who initiated state-led industrialization as part of his Westernization policies.
  • Collectivization: Stalin’s policy of forcing individual peasant farms into large, state-controlled collective farms (kolkhozy) in the Soviet Union.
  • Five-Year Plans: Centralized economic plans in the Soviet Union, starting in 1928 under Stalin, that prioritized heavy industry.
  • Navigation Acts: A series of British laws starting in 1651 that restricted colonial trade to benefit England.
  • Iron Act of 1750: A British law that restricted the growth of the finished iron industry in the American colonies.
  • Commodore Matthew Perry: U.S. naval officer whose expedition in 1853-54 forced Japan to open to international trade.
  • Meiji Restoration: The 1868 political revolution in Japan that overthrew the Tokugawa Shogunate and restored imperial rule, launching Japan’s modernization.
  • Fukoku kyōhei: The slogan of the Meiji era, meaning “Enrich the country, strengthen the military.”
  • Zaibatsu: Large family-controlled industrial and financial conglomerates that dominated the Japanese economy before World War II (e.g., Mitsubishi, Mitsui).
  • Guild System: Medieval associations of artisans or merchants that controlled the practice of their craft in a particular town. It declined with the rise of the factory system.

Mains Insights

1. Diverse Paths to Industrialization: A Comparative Analysis

  • State-led vs. Laissez-faire: The industrialization of Britain was largely a bottom-up process driven by private entrepreneurs with minimal state intervention (laissez-faire). In contrast, countries like Germany, Japan, and Russia followed a state-led model. The state in these countries actively directed capital, protected infant industries with tariffs, and invested in infrastructure and education to catch up with early industrializers. This highlights the debate between market-driven and state-driven development models.
  • Role of Pre-existing Conditions: The success and speed of industrialization depended heavily on pre-existing factors. Britain had political stability, capital from colonial trade, and key resources. Germany had a strong tradition of technical education and state bureaucracy (Cameralism). Japan had high literacy rates and national cohesion. In contrast, political disunity in Italy and the feudal structure in Russia were significant impediments.
  • First Mover vs. Latecomers: Britain, as the first mover, innovated technologies organically. Latecomers like Japan and Germany had the advantage of being able to “borrow” and adapt existing technologies, allowing them to leapfrog certain developmental stages and industrialize much more rapidly.

2. Industrialization, Imperialism, and Global Conflict

  • Cause-and-Effect Relationship: The Industrial Revolution was a primary driver of the “New Imperialism” of the late 19th century. The need for raw materials, new markets for surplus goods, and profitable investment outlets created intense pressure for colonial expansion. This establishes a direct causal link between industrial capitalism and modern imperialism.
  • Historiographical Debate (Hobson-Lenin Thesis): Scholars like J.A. Hobson and V.I. Lenin argued that imperialism was an inevitable economic consequence of capitalism. Lenin, in Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), famously contended that competition among capitalist nations for colonies and resources would inevitably lead to war. The scramble for Africa and the growing Anglo-German naval race before 1914 can be viewed through this lens, making industrial rivalry a fundamental cause of World War I.
  • Creation of a Global Economic Hierarchy: Industrialization created a new global division of labor. The industrialized nations of the “Global North” became producers of high-value manufactured goods, while the colonized or less-developed “Global South” was integrated into the world economy primarily as a supplier of low-value raw materials and agricultural products. This created a structure of dependency and unequal exchange that has shaped global economic relations to this day.

3. Socio-Economic Transformation and its Ethical Dimensions

  • Emergence of New Social Classes and Ideologies: Industrialization destroyed the old feudal and agrarian social orders and created a new society based on class: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The harsh conditions of the working class (long hours, low wages, unsafe factories, child labor) gave rise to new political ideologies like Socialism and Communism (Marxism), which challenged the capitalist system itself. This created the central political cleavage of the 19th and 20th centuries: the conflict between capital and labor.
  • The Paradox of Progress: While the Industrial Revolution led to unprecedented technological advancement, economic growth, and a long-term rise in the standard of living, its immediate social costs were immense. Urban squalor, exploitation, social alienation, and environmental degradation were widespread. This raises a crucial ethical question about development: does the end (national power, economic growth) justify the means (human suffering, social disruption)? The forced industrialization under Stalin, which lifted the USSR to a superpower status at the cost of millions of lives, is the most extreme example of this ethical dilemma.
  • Globalization: An Interconnected World: The dependency of industrial nations on external sources for food and raw materials, and the dependency of non-industrial nations on manufactured goods, created a deeply interconnected global economy. This early form of globalization made nations more prosperous but also more vulnerable to global economic shocks and political rivalries, a dynamic that continues to define the contemporary world.

Graph View